I cannot buy into the virus nonsense because no one can explain where they come from, how they move around, where they go during the warmer months, how something supposedly dead can come back to life, how there can be hundreds or thousands, how not having any vaccines I don't get the flu, how they stay in the body IF we have an immune system, how transmission works, how there are no studies showing efficacy, how viruses cause death, why there is no method of detection that is worth a hill of beans, etc.
There is just nothing to hang my hat on. Nothing to be concerned with and nothing to worry about. And no doctor that can explain anything about viruses. CASED CLOSED.
“Viruses have been around for a few billion years, but it’s not clear which evolved first: viruses or cells. Three theories try to explain where viruses came from.
The first suggests that genes encoding viruses might originally have come from cells, like bacteria. Small sections of DNA may have escaped from a cell’s genome, eventually gaining a protein coat: bingo! The first virus.
The second theory suggests viruses evolved from an ancient single-cell organism that stopped being able to reproduce by itself, becoming dependent on host cells instead.
The final hypothesis proposes that viruses existed before cells; ancient viruses may have evolved over time to produce membranes and cell walls, giving rise to living cells. It’s possible that all these theories are right.”
All theories being right is logically impossible.
This is not scientific uncertainty—this is narrative flexibility
If viruses came from cells (Theory 1), they can’t have existed before cells (Theory 3).
If viruses came first (Theory 3), they can’t have come from cells (Theory 1 & 2).
Wikipedia:
“The history of virology – the scientific study of viruses and the infections they cause – began in the closing years of the 19th century. Although Edward Jenner and Louis Pasteur developed the first vaccines to protect against viral infections, they did not know that viruses existed.”
Virology is nonsense from its beginning to it's eventual end.
Structures formed from the meristematic masses. Looks to me like they poisoned everyone with parasites constructed in the Rothchild crown corporation labs around the kingdom.
SV is defined as a virus however never isolated and characterized. The chromatin paper you reference is 70s-style virus bullshitting. Using their own words, only chromatin was isolated. Since SV40 has never been isolated there can be no SV40 infected cells to get SV40 chromatin from.The chromatin paper is using an electron microscope while the globs are light microscopy of plant embryonic material and thousands of times larger than a never-found virus could be.
👉Who do you think was poisoned with what and when? You would need isolation of a pathogenic material, characterization of such and recreation of the same illness and reisolation of such. Nothing you wrote has anything to do with finding a virus, a chemical, a bacteria, a parasite or any other pathogenic material of a human disease or disease of any living matter.
Nicely thought through and well written, thank you.
"I will just add that I do not believe people are stupid, asleep, willfully ignorant, or even entirely responsible for the positions they take or the feelings they have when confronted with information that challenges their beliefs..."
I do so believe. But why?
Because some people do manage to think, question, challenge on lack of evidence, and identify stupid logical fallacies. Anyone who cannot spot a logical fallacy is, indeed, stupid. If 'smart' cannot identify logical fallacies, what good is it? What would be the difference between smart and stupid?
But why are so many stupid? Because they've been trained from childhood to obey, to worship (what amounts to 'political') authorities as "The Deciders who Know". To varying degrees, most people live that way. Habitual deference to 'Authority" over a life time makes people literally stupid and dishonest. They can't even figure out what is right or wrong, not when Authority comes calling. 'Deference and Obedience...that's right. Thinking and questioning...that's wrong'.
They never learn to practice and trust their own reasoned judgements about anything controversial.
But how could I possibly know all that to be true? I am only one man. I know it BECAUSE I can think and have noticed throughout life that others do not; and because occasionally I do encounter some individual in person who exhibits willingness and ability to think.
I also know it because I understand that we live in the age of the PostModern. Modernity, the age of the rise of reason, is largely past now. To borrow phrasing from Ayn Rand, reason is today an outcast, and nearly an outlaw.
Naturally, in this age of Postmodernity, reason is mistrusted and maligned and devotion to Authority is ascending. This causes tyranny, because individual freedom requires individual thinking among people with lives of their own. People today mostly want to be led and fed. They feel that policy of life is 'practical'.
When people long for a collective mind to (somehow) supplant their own individual responsibility to question and think, they will support tyranny. They will gravitate toward the "civic virtue" of "public health" and the myth of viruses. It feels right to them.
I hear you. My stance is that all the ways people do not want to know, seem "stupid," want to blindly obey, etc., are due to programming and conditioning. This is not how human beings are inherently. We have been subjected to manipulation and control for a long time on this planet. And if that's the case, there's some real, true humanness underneath all that programming that could rise to the surface. It is my hope and belief that this is possible. That's why I refuse to write off anyone for not wanting to know the truth.
THanks, the one's worth spending time presenting data and reasoning to are precisely those willing to think. The others do not influence anyone, except maybe some other passives.
I was very pro-vaccine and believed in germ theory right up to hearing a Dr Andrew Wakefield interview about a connection between the MMR shots and autism around 2016. I was stunned by what he was saying, and he sounded so believable and trustworthy, yet a Google search found so many full of criticism of him! All were only ad hominem attacks, with zero providing a counterargument that made any sense as to why this doctor may be wrong.
I dug further and found evidence from the mainstream was very confusing and contradictory and seemingly deliberately so, hence the movie VAXXED being so successful. That was the first time I knew that the media was lying about vaccines, and it really woke me up to look into what else they are lying about when it comes to vaccines, especially. I will not accept being lied to, especially when related to health, so I went from very pro-vaccine to completely against all vaccines, which are all poisons in my mind.
Since that time I also no longer believe that any virus exists, as none has scientifically been proven to exist, and also don't believe in the germ theory nonsense.
My wake-up moment was Andrew Wakefield in 2016. I would love to hear when others first woke up to this fraud.
Also, regarding "why intelligent, thoughtful people are so resistant to this information" – the first thing is, why are they happy to be lied to? Surely, as "intelligent" people, they cannot be so weak-minded as to not see that we are being lied to. Don't they care? Intelligence without wisdom is not much good at all. "Intelligent" alone is good for nothing if it leads you to walk off a cliff while ignoring several flashing red warning signs warning you to turn around or stop.
It's good you woke up, even by Wakefield, but Dr. Wake was a dog and pony show. They needed something to quell the masses, not us who have already woken up, nor you, ready to wake up.
This was just around the same time the CDC was realizing that a correlation between autism and vaccines was going to be hard to keep a lid on.
Dr. Wake was a hopium hero that led to the massive and successful bashing of anti-vax that we still see today. He was one of Albert Pikes’, “we supply heroes” for the masses.
Very interesting, what you say, and I totally agree. Regarding "He [Dr Wakefield] has never rescinded his claims of working with viruses even in Covid times," this has always disappointed me about Dr Wakefield. Despite the serious harms he discovered from the MMR shots, he is still pro-vaccine! For that, I have not listened to anything he has said for several years now. Your "dog and pony show" description seems to make sense, even though I'm still thankful, of course, that Dr Wakefield woke me up as I'm not sure anyone else could have at that time – yes, I was that pro-vaccine!
The term 'anti-vax' is nonsense, of course, when you know the true history of vaccines and their great harms, and that germ theory is and always has been a psyop. Sadly, though, the majority do seem to believe 'anti-vax' equates to stupid or ignorant when in reality those believing that are the real ignorant or stupid ones. Many have woken up since "Covid", of course, though the vast majority, I believe, still think that vaccines are somehow necessary for our survival! Yes, they are that ignorant/stupid.
I believe the term "anti-vax" was coined by the industry to try to maintain the narrative, just as "conspiracy theory" was coined by the CIA to discredit anyone who dissented from the official narrative around JFK's assassination. I read that the term "anti-vax" started to show up around 15 years ago--maybe there was a drop in vaccine uptake around then, not sure. But far in advance of Covid, this term was being sharpened for use.
You may be right on that as "anti-vax" has certainly been weaponised to make people believe only a lunatic would think that vaccines have not been the great saviour of mankind and saved millions of lives etc! When you know the truth about vaccines and their great harms and that they have never saved a single person as poison doesn't heal but only harm then you know that the term "anti-vax" is something to be happy to be labelled not ashamed of. Ignorant people will not see this though, and sadly the vast majority likely close to 99% are like that. The ones that do their research go anti-vax, those that don't remain ignorant and will pay the price at some point with their health as many did from 2021 especially when the poison shots were being rolled out. But hey, we were all ignorant at some point so I will not call anyone for that but only if they are told the truth on vaccines but simply ignore it - then little hope for those people sadly.
I only found Wakefield way later. But saw both vaxxed films. This is somewhat 7 years ago, and by then I was already wondering about jabs. Then I bought dissolving Illusions. And today I got a copy of Poisoned needle. Started reading immediately. the truth has been known for more than 100 years. But money... as Mrs McBean states, what keeps you healthy costs nothing, and all these doctors want macmansions and beemers...
I've seen both vaxxed films too and would always recommend vaxxed 2 to anyone questioning whether a link exists. Vaxxed 1 proved the CDC found a link and tried to cover it up and bury it and is still denying a link to this day even though it was 100% proven by themselves! Vaxxed 2 is of course the parents' stories version with so many horror stories from mums and dads who saw the serious harms develop in their young children, often immediately after taking the poison, which is no surprise when you know what you know. You are aware of course having seen these films so just commenting in case anyone hasn't seen v1 or v2.
Those two books, Dissolving Illusions and The Poisoned Needle, are a great recommendation, as they really do show the truth about vaccines, what really makes us ill, and the fear porn, disinformation, gaslighting, hypocrisy, etc. that was alive and well from the governments, doctors and MSM all those years ago just as today.
Eleanor McBean was trying to inform as many as possible and had to write her book as she knew the people were being lied to. What a brave woman and incredible human being she was, and her book should be read my everyone - especially the weak-minded "I'm not anti-vax" lot.
Absolutely. Mine is not the authentic book but a new large format reprint, which I love because of it! Just unbelievable how doctors, nurses, organizations are continuing to poison people all the while this is known for so long. If that does not prove the ill will of those, what does?
Exactly, and many doctors and nurses were still pushing the "Covid" poison jabs long after the deaths and serious harms had been reported. No doubt they were not telling their patients of the proven risks from that jab but only to get their sleeve rolled up - pure evil, and they know it. In a sane world, those doctors and nurses would be behind bars for the rest of their lives with the worst of them facing the death penalty.
Regarding reprinting of books, I love that it's so easy to get a reprint of a book and have done that myself from an old book and plan to do again soon.
I woke up in June 2020 with the Covid fraud. I had been ambivalent about vaccines thinking they were of some use but not for the 'flu as people fell ill anyway. I have not had a vaccine for over 30 years if not 45.
The whole virology and vaccines fraud came crashing down in that June, and I realised how badly we had been deceived. I am now exceedingly angry about it and why I set up my WordPress site that same month, coming also to substack in April 2023.
I was undergoing immunotherapy that year (another story) and it was that experience that helped me understand what was going on. The cancer industry is another scam.
Yes, the cancer industry is indeed another scam - so many scams and so many people still believing in them, sadly. I think most people who have woken up are like you in that they did around 2020 - as the level of manipulation we were going through was off the charts so quite easy for all but the weak-minded to seriously question what we were being told. One of my sisters and I were awoken to the many scams years earlier, but others in my family or friends either did not wake up or did so in 2020/21. Great that you have created your own website, as good way forward and know many others have done this to help get the word out. Youtube of course is the best for reach but toxic for free speech with many genuine comments being removed with hysterical level shadowbanning going on there.
Thank you for your writing(s); well written. I'm not sure I understand how it is that I came around to real-eyes'ing, five years ago, that we are lied to; I remember, six years ago I guess, my step-mother and I were talking on the phone, as this 'plague' was beginning to shut the world down, and she was telling me this is all a lie, information were hearing just isn't true. I recall that I was rolling my eyes at her, as she was talking about articles she read and videos she watched, and I asked her if she would send me her links (I was believing everything that was happening and hanging on to the media's narrative). She sent me the links, I started reading them and, well...the rest is history for me. (I am married and can't say the same awakening happened for my husband!)
I'm glad to hear this! I have attempted to send my son information, and he doesn't look at it. I was thinking of him when I wrote that I get the reaction, "I know you're not crazy, but you've had some wild ideas in the past so I think this is just one more of those." It's frustrating!
I think I'm learning that no matter what you simply cannot get through to people. You have all the opportunity in the world to get through to people close to you such as your son and no matter how much discussion, how much information you won't get through. And yes, it's incredibly frustrating for those of us who value rational thought.
There is a simple thought experiment anyone can do to test the germ hypothesis (even though the germ hypothesis was roundly defeated EVERY.SINGLE.TIME.IT.WAS.TESTED if you bother consulting the scientific research but whatevs). It goes as follows:
Imagine you were told black lung disease is a real disease and is a consequence of inhaling coal dust. Thus, you would expect that coal miners would get this disease, to the exclusion of almost everyone else.
But imagine, on your surprise, that coal miners - or coal refiners, or anyone else in a coal-focused industry (steel, etc.) - didn't get this disease any more often than anyone else. And, in fact, perhaps preschool teachers "got it" more often, despite an almost total lack of exposure to the causative agent.
To the dullest person, this would be a clue: "We must have misattributed the cause of this disease!"
But to the smartest person, it would become yet more evidence of the rock-solid evidence of the "coal hypothesis."
It's the same with germs. Do doctors and nurses get sick much more often than everyone else - and, if germ hypothesis were correct, should get sick multiple times per year with 99.9999% certainty? No, they don't. They interact with sick people pretty much, literally, as in literally literally, 8 hours per day. Every day. They are dealing with "contagious" patients all day as part of their jobs. Now add in pharmacists and basically anyone in retail who has to deal with supposedly "contagious" customers all day long.
And nothing happens. They don't get sick any more or less often than anyone else does, even though - according to the hypothesis - they probably should all be dead now.
That should be the end of the discussion. But it's not for a lot of people, and that's because science is fake and people don't understand what thinking is. Science - in ideal terms - is a process of thinking about empirical evidence (abbreviated definition). Science - in actual terms - is a faith-based religious belief system that scorns thinking and is essentially a very complicated way of performing auguries and rationalizing contradictory evidence, sometimes by using really hefty math equations that are imaginatively interpreted. Education - in actual terms - is the process of destroying your ability to think.
The following is a transcription from a claimed psychiatrist on her lessons learned over ten years--sorry, no attribution available. For what it’s worth:
“You’re brain doesn’t believe what’s true. It believes what you repeat. Your thoughts shape your feelings. Your feelings drive your actions and your actions become your identity. Your brain is always receiving, so who you are is changeable. Say something often enough with enough emotion and your brain starts to believe it. That’s why self-talk really matters. It’s not harmless, it’s extremely powerful. It’s like casting a spell your brain and body can overhear. The way you speak to yourself shapes how you feel about yourself. And your life will always reflect who you think you are. Your brain doesn’t know the difference between real and imagined. So, when you visualize the calm capable version of yourself, you’re literally rewiring your brain for it. You don’t own your thoughts, they visit you! You don’t have to believe all of them. You can’t think yourself out of a feeling, but you can feel your way into a new way of thinking. Emotions that don’t get processed stay stored in your nervous system. Your body always keeps a score. Most of behavior is automatic, it’s subconscious. Your brain guesses what’s next based on old experiences. If you change the data, you can change the future.”
I too have wondered, what makes me different that I can entertain and inevitably accept this concept?
The mind-expanding realization that viruses don't exist was the first of several other logical fallacies that I discovered I had wrongly believed. Then I began to wonder if these weren't actually fallacies and that perhaps there is something about my personality that likes to be right and have some kind of hidden knowledge that separates me from the rest of society. Like a wannabe gnostic. Maybe it goes back to being the only kid who knew Santa was a lie...
But no, that can't be it, because they are fallacies and I know it. I just share the info with very few people because I know most won't even consider it. And no one I have told has accepted it. Thanks for sharing this article.
The book The Invisible Rainbow talks about how doctors during the 1918 flu injected saliva of "infected" persons with a syringe into the mouth of people and horses, and the injected did not get sick. Once I started looking at illness as the body's way of detoxing, and viruses as a symptom, not a cause, this shifted my mindset. What do you think about exosomes/ viral particles as a symptom?
What you say about experiments to prove contagion is so true. Daniel Roytas' book Can You Catch A Cold? analyzes hundreds--yes, hundreds--of studies about contagion over the past more than 100 years, and none of them found evidence that sick people or animals make healthy ones sick. Not even using the excruciatingly unnatural exposure routes that they have studied. This should be a slam-dunk against the germ theory, but somehow this information has been hiding in plain sight all this time.
On the subject of exosomes, they are not symptoms of anything. They are, as I understand it, particles of dead cell matter. Viruses also aren't any kind of symptom. It is the process of detoxing that produces symptoms as the body's elimination pathways are ramped up to push out what shouldn't be in the body, i.e. toxins and the dead cells they have killed.
There's no virus involved in detox symptoms. Viruses are fictional entities imagined into (fake) existence by hubristic scientists like Louis Pasteur who decided that symptoms could be defined as different diseases, and if they were caused by different microbes, there was a mint to be made on hundreds of different vaccines. It has pleased and benefited the Rockefeller medicine people, who took control of medicine in the early 20th century, to maintain this falsity to also make billions on patented pharmaceuticals and keep people feeling dependent on them.
Since viruses have never been found, and can't possibly be found through the methodology currently in use, as far as we know they do not exist. Maybe they'll be found someday, but I highly doubt it.
Mixing definitions makes it extremely hard for ppl to get convinced.
For a starter. Virus does exist, but not in the way they want you to believe it. Virus is old Greek for poison, they spread airborne by Chemtrails and nebulizing or through food and drinks, so not some mystical germ that is dead but still can replicate (Alice in... any?)
Then you have the Flue / influenza, also hangover, vomiting, diarrhea which is the process of detoxifying the body of the virus (poison)
What you say is 100% true. But "chemical poison" is not the definition of "virus" in our time. Virus as a tiny entity that replicates in cells causing disease and death is what doesn't exist.
I disagree, that the cabal twisted the definition does not change the meaning of the word virus. I believe if you explain this the the non believers, it will be easier to understand that they have been played. It also makes it more logic why we get the flue. The body detoxes with the following symptoms.
With all due respect, I disagree. I have written many articles about what symptoms are and why the body needs to detox. My whole Substack is about this. In my view it is confusing to talk about virus with a definition most people have never heard of. The whole world was shut down and millions, maybe billions of people took an experimental injection trying to protect themselves from a virus that does not exist--a virus in the current, incorrect but accepted definition. The information that virus has a different definition is new to almost everyone. The current meaning is what needs to be dispelled.
''Since viruses have never been found, and can't possibly be found through the methodology currently in use, as far as we know they do not exist. Maybe they'll be found someday, but I highly doubt it.''
Roman, viruses are ONLY A CONCEPT that had died on the starting line. They are conceptually defined as an infectious particle about 150nm in size with genetic material that codes for itself and a protein coat that replicates in cells and spreads from host to host and causes disease. This kind of particle has never been found-you have to be careful to even suggest they exist as that promotes the propaganda Betsy notes undermines society.
An exosome is a vesicle derived from the membranous material of a cell also near 150nm, there is no protein coat. It may have genetic material in it but that material is not coding for itself. It is not infectious nor replicates inside of cells nor destroys them. The body makes them all the time for communication, for detox, and when cells die.
But the dead cell material is not a virus. It's what they see in electron microscope pictures that they point to with arrows and say, "virus," but that is not a virus as it is currently being defined. Just to clarify.
I think you're right, Roman. With the way “viruses” are so-called DNA fragments it makes sense that they are actually indicative of the body discharging or detoxing something, not the cause of the illness as assumed.
I think it may be a mistake to call dead cell material "viruses." This word already has had its meaning changed from "poison" to "half-alive predatory entity that parasitizes healthy cells." I'm for not muddying the water further by calling something else, i.e. material from broken cells, a virus. Plus, I would not call the presence of dead cell material a "symptom" in any case. To me, symptoms are physical experiences--congestion, coughing, vomiting, skin rash, fever, etc. Dead cellular material happens on a level way below our awareness so it really isn't a symptom. My opinion.
I can see understandable reasons for people maintaining belief in viruses/contagion however fraudulent the science:
1. There is no clear cut alternative cause provided for colds and flu.
2. There is a very strong sense of contagion, for example, it feels very much to parents that the reason they have a cold is that they caught it from their child who got sick from illness "going around" in their pre-school.
Why they maintain belief in other lies when there are very good alternative explanations is another matter.
Unfortunately, what is required is what most people don't have: an open mind.
Understanding logical fallacies is certainly no guarantee: Dr Bo Bennett runs the site logicallyfallacious.com and totally follows the mainstream narrative on everything as do the self-described group of critical thinking experts (including academics at the University of Queensland and Jesse Richardson (founder of sites yourfallacy.is and yourbias.is)) who have produced truly appalling gamified tests at conspiracytest.org which aim to coax you out of your conspiracy thinking.
I have written two perfectly rational and civil responses to the conspiracytest.org website and emailed them to the 10 people in the group with zero response. This is despite Jesse making the point that intellectual humility is of such great importance.
" … we are emotional and social creatures first and rational creatures very much second … it’s really the mindset we go into things in the first place that really matters because you can weaponise fallacies and use them to close down arguments and be more irrational if you’re that way inclined. It really takes intellectual humility and being honest with yourself to be able to be receptive and to progress both personally and collectively to a better place."
"This is the abiding question of the past six years. Why did some of us find it possible to see through the lies when so many were taken in? What is different about us? Finding some answers to this might help us in our quest to get through to those who do not want to know. The fact that I was able to overcome the inertia of this narrative, along with many, many others, is still a puzzle to me."
Yes, this is the abiding question isn't it Betsy? You and I have asked this of each other so many times. I'm glad that you brought it up here. I'm wondering if there is some common thread among all of us, but I doubt that is the case. I hearken back to my own awakening regarding the virus. But I think I was one step ahead of the game from the get go. I had questioned JFK, Vietnam, 911, and others. I had also questioned health dogma - circumcision, medicated childbirth, vaccines (although not thoroughly enough to save my children and not totally myself, until now) I quit getting mammograms and refused statins, though very qualified to take them, giving my cholesterol level.
Still, like you said, belief in the virus is so very deeply embedded. Why would I ever question that? I never heard of anyone who had done so. My own awakening began with Zach Bush, who told such a beautiful story of viruses actually being part of a natural evolution of the human body. To update us, to make us healthier (or something to that effect) Not sure now how he ever came to that conclusion - certainly not scientifically, but it was a great story.
At the time I was receiving regular posts from Michael Mendizza, who had spread the work of Joseph Chilton Pierce (Crack in the Cosmic Egg) He introduced me to Tom Cowan and Sally Fallon's book, "The Contagion Myth". I vacillated then between what Zach had to say and the new thought of "no virus". How could that be so? But logic and the knowledge of the propensity of harm from Western medicine won out.
I look back to my childhood to figure out why I question so much. Raised by strong Catholics, I was strictly adherent until young adulthood. hmmm. I was strongly told to stand up for my beliefs. Is there something to that? To stand up for what is "right"? Does that also mean that to know what is "right" means to continually ask that question of oneself?
I am also a very logical thinker. Was that part of my birthright?
Anyway, I've gone on kind of a deep search of my own psyche here. My own search probably doesn't apply to others, but it is my contribution to how are some of us are able to see through the lies.
Thanks, Betsy. Your contributions to the virus story are invaluable.
Another possible commonality I've heard is being on the outside as children and teens, not being so inclined to "follow the crowd." Or being "old souls" who have seen all this before. I don't know if there is an answer to this, really--perhaps it's just the luck of the draw, or being in the right place at the right time to hear or read one fact that opened our minds to question everything, or connected with something in us that was ready to hear that.
I, too, was charmed by Zach Bush's lyrical story of how viruses have been responsible for some leaps of evolution, such as the fact that women have a uterus. But I never heard him offer any evidence for these claims. How does he know viruses helped us have uteruses? Where is the evidence of their contributing to evolution? (I have my doubts about that narrative too.) Especially, where is the evidence if viruses have not even been found, or if they are "neither dead nor alive" but somewhere in between. How does that work, exactly?
In the end, I had to go with the more "science-y" folks--Drs. Cowan, Kaufman, Sam and Mark Bailey, and Mike Stone, Christine Massey etc.--who are simply asking for the scientific evidence that viruses have ever been found and isolated. All they get--even me, from some commenters--is ad hominem attacks, appeals to authority, and strawman arguments (e.g., bacteria do so exist and are visible in microscopes! Yeah, that's not what I'm talking about here). There is never any effort to address the questions that are raised, at least I've never seen it. Which in itself is highly suspect. If you have the evidence, just show it to us and we'll shut up! But they don't. And the ad hominem stuff can be vicious.
Something about your comment resonated with me, Rose. I'm not sure what because only in the past 5 years have I started seeing all of the lies, so I'm a bit behind. I also wasn't raised Catholic, nor told to stand up for what feels right, and I don't call myself a "logical thinker." However, I do have an open mind, and I believe that is why I can see the truth. Just don't understand what took me so long. 🤔 Glad I finally arrived - I have so much to learn! Thank you for listing some of the names of those who you have learned from, for I will be reading up on them.
Oh, one thing that I really related to is searching for my own psyche.. Why I do the things I do... What shaped my way of thinking? I have spent a lot of time trying to understand others, especially those who make tragic life choices. It has always fascinated me, but now I would like to understand myself better so that I can heal. ☺️
Misty, I didn't mean to imply that being raised Catholic had something to do with my questioning. Possibly my long ago Mennonite ancestors had something to do with my taking the path less traveled by. My Catholic folks and grandmother instilled in me a strong moral sense but they didn't necessarily ask questions. I did want to do the "right" thing, even if that made me different from others.
I think there is no common thread among all of us who find ourselves in this beautiful, yet difficult place of questioning the virus. That is as it should be. We are all unique human beings. We have found a common alliance. I am so grateful to all of you for finding your way to this experience we share.
I have always been amazed by people's lack of curiosity. They want to be force fed simple ideas and don't want to go to the effort to think and explore for themselves about anything complex. They also don't want to cut themselves off from the herd. It is especially hard to get university educated people to go against what they are told continually are the opinions of good, smart people.
I would suggest this is because of life conditions (e.g., poverty, trauma, etc.) that affect families not to instill these values in children, along with education that actively teaches us not to have curiosity but to accept what we are told and parrot it back. I don't believe lack of curiosity is a human trait. It is a conditioned response.
Newcomer to your Substack. Very interesting article. I was thinking about why some people are open-minded about viruses and others seem so convinced that they are right. I would like to offer my perspective.
As I reflect on my own journey, the thing that stands out is that early on, I deviated from the path that society laid out for me. Every step of the way, I followed the path less traveled. For example, at age 17, I joined the Marine Corps after dropping out of high school. Received my GED after serving as a grunt in Vietnam. After my service, mostly under the GI Bill, I managed to go to college for 14 years continuously through summer school. And then, continuing my deviance, managed to spread my education across 3+ Masters despite the many admonitions to obtain just one PhD.
Along the way, I learned that in a real sense, we live in a matrix. One of my Masters is in Philosophy. There are two valuable disciplines embedded within Philosophy: Logic and Philosophy of Science. This background has shaped my independent thinking.
Accordingly, I see red flags when I read that vaccine trials are usually done without a proper control group. Or that the independent variable is assumed to be contained in a swab taken from an infected person before culturing in a petri dish. Or that the Cytopathic Effect is indirect proof of the presence of a virus. And so on. From my perspective, these examples highlight that the edifice of Virology is a house of cards. But the most astonishing thing of all is the length of time that this pseudo-paradigm has been allowed to wear the mantle of science.
If only more people knew what real science looks like and how it's done, we would not be so easy to fool. Virology is only one scientific field of many that are not conducted rigorously and are not even based on anything real but only on guesswork and inference. Yet we must "trust the science" and not ever question it! It's religion.
I am still in the process of grasping they don't. If you have lived with the idea for 60+ years and then come across something totally different, it is hard to understand. I bought a Bechamp book 2 years ago but it was very hard to read. But the more I read, the more it seems obvious. In fact, it seems Pasteur at the end of his life confessed the fraud, but by then, the narrative was fixed and no one seems to have tried another path. There are bacteria and funghi, which we can see, some even with the bare eye. I read about the experiments to make healthy people sick that lead nowhere. The fact that sometimes you 'catch' something and other times you don't, proves that contagion is not an explanation. been in houses with sick people quite often without 'catching it'.
And there are lots of times where we don't even remember being with someone who was sick and not getting sick! Nothing happened, so there's nothing to remember.
Two things enabled me to move away from the belief in viruses.
(1) In the 8th grade, a teacher encouraged me to read philiosophy books. Ever since, I've been interested in philosophy and logical argumentation. Since I've never found any evidence that viruses exist, I simply cannot believe that viruses exist.
(2) I installed several computer systems for billing in blood labs, where the 1st machines/robots completed blood tests. I was shocked, because none of the doctors showed the slightest interest about whether the results of the blood tests were correct, but all of the doctors responsible for these blood labs wanted extensive testing to ensure that every single blood test completed was charged to someone or some health insurance company. In addition, those doctors all read newspaper articles and magazines about winning in the stock market or earning more by investing in real estate. I never saw a medical book or journal in any of those blood test labs. That changed my view about medical doctors!
I cannot buy into the virus nonsense because no one can explain where they come from, how they move around, where they go during the warmer months, how something supposedly dead can come back to life, how there can be hundreds or thousands, how not having any vaccines I don't get the flu, how they stay in the body IF we have an immune system, how transmission works, how there are no studies showing efficacy, how viruses cause death, why there is no method of detection that is worth a hill of beans, etc.
There is just nothing to hang my hat on. Nothing to be concerned with and nothing to worry about. And no doctor that can explain anything about viruses. CASED CLOSED.
Indeed.
"In a universe with entropy, how does something that cannot reproduce outside of a host cell get going in the first place?"
Very Brief Viral Genesis:
BBC
Where did viruses come from?
“Viruses have been around for a few billion years, but it’s not clear which evolved first: viruses or cells. Three theories try to explain where viruses came from.
The first suggests that genes encoding viruses might originally have come from cells, like bacteria. Small sections of DNA may have escaped from a cell’s genome, eventually gaining a protein coat: bingo! The first virus.
The second theory suggests viruses evolved from an ancient single-cell organism that stopped being able to reproduce by itself, becoming dependent on host cells instead.
The final hypothesis proposes that viruses existed before cells; ancient viruses may have evolved over time to produce membranes and cell walls, giving rise to living cells. It’s possible that all these theories are right.”
All theories being right is logically impossible.
This is not scientific uncertainty—this is narrative flexibility
If viruses came from cells (Theory 1), they can’t have existed before cells (Theory 3).
If viruses came first (Theory 3), they can’t have come from cells (Theory 1 & 2).
Wikipedia:
“The history of virology – the scientific study of viruses and the infections they cause – began in the closing years of the 19th century. Although Edward Jenner and Louis Pasteur developed the first vaccines to protect against viral infections, they did not know that viruses existed.”
Virology is nonsense from its beginning to it's eventual end.
The sooner the better...
Do we have the isolation and purification of this new bird flu?
Avian flu virus H5N1: No proof for existence, pathogenicity, or pandemic potential; non-“H5N1” causation omitted
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7173052/
Microscope Proves , chicken flu, Fraud.
https://protonmagic.substack.com/p/chick-filet-virus-grips-wikistan?triedRedirect=true
More fakery from the wizards
Moderna CEO Stéphane Bancel Says They ‘Copied & Pasted’ the Spike Sequence From the Chinese Government
https://open.substack.com/pub/lionessofjudah/p/moderna-ceo-we-never-had-access-to?r=145evj&utm_medium=ios
Do we have the isolation and purification documents of Covid 19 it appears it never existed?
FOIs reveal that health/science institutions around the world (225 and counting!) have no record of SARS-COV-2 isolation/purification, anywhere, ever
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/fois-reveal-that-health-science-institutions-around-the-world-have-no-record-of-sars-cov-2-isolation-purification/
They knew contagion didn't exist after the 1923 Lancaster Study, but they continued to push the fear narrative to keep a control on humanity.
https://en.rattibha.com/thread/1629159544348717061
ABOUT A YEAR INTO THE KANSAS FLU A STUDY CAME OUT CALLED THE THE
LANDMARK STUDY OF MILTON J.
ROSENAU, MD, "EXPERIMENTS TO DETERMINE MODE OF SPREAD OF INFLUENZA," WAS PUBLISHED IN THE JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL
ASSOCIATION IN 1919.
https://www.ggarchives.com/Influenza/TheRosenauExperiment-1918-1919.html
Dr Jane Ruby explains the genocidal Globalist agenda a must watch
https://x.com/RealDrJaneRuby/status/1876833307620409668?t=5RCGnvy0qXHVcikKzTpTNA&s=09
There we go living organisms
SV40 is classified as a virus = poison ☠️ in Latin so what died SV40 look like under a microscope is it a parasite a chemical or a bacteria?
The Structure of SV 40 Chromatin
https://www.jstor.org/stable/2417946
Structures formed from the meristematic masses. Looks to me like they poisoned everyone with parasites constructed in the Rothchild crown corporation labs around the kingdom.
https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Structures-formed-from-the-meristematic-masses-a-b-Globular-structures-that_fig3_226419065
Whatever it is it reminded me of Parastie eggs anyone have anymore information on SV40 poison?
https://patents.google.com/patent/US5863794A/en
Cancer study
https://substack.com/@nichulscher/note/p-173440494?r=145evj&utm_medium=ios&utm_source=notes-share-action
Court case Amsterdam
https://open.substack.com/pub/bailiwicknews/p/netherlands-case-update-appeal-of?r=145evj&utm_medium=ios
SV is defined as a virus however never isolated and characterized. The chromatin paper you reference is 70s-style virus bullshitting. Using their own words, only chromatin was isolated. Since SV40 has never been isolated there can be no SV40 infected cells to get SV40 chromatin from.The chromatin paper is using an electron microscope while the globs are light microscopy of plant embryonic material and thousands of times larger than a never-found virus could be.
👉Who do you think was poisoned with what and when? You would need isolation of a pathogenic material, characterization of such and recreation of the same illness and reisolation of such. Nothing you wrote has anything to do with finding a virus, a chemical, a bacteria, a parasite or any other pathogenic material of a human disease or disease of any living matter.
SV40 19 22 4 9 = Omega Death they poison us with many substances death by 1000 cuts.
https://www.chop.edu/vaccine-education-center/vaccine-safety/vaccine-ingredients/sv40
Numerology is fine and may suggest nasty people but there is still no logic to anything about a pathogen or chemical tox from the info you provided.
Nicely thought through and well written, thank you.
"I will just add that I do not believe people are stupid, asleep, willfully ignorant, or even entirely responsible for the positions they take or the feelings they have when confronted with information that challenges their beliefs..."
I do so believe. But why?
Because some people do manage to think, question, challenge on lack of evidence, and identify stupid logical fallacies. Anyone who cannot spot a logical fallacy is, indeed, stupid. If 'smart' cannot identify logical fallacies, what good is it? What would be the difference between smart and stupid?
But why are so many stupid? Because they've been trained from childhood to obey, to worship (what amounts to 'political') authorities as "The Deciders who Know". To varying degrees, most people live that way. Habitual deference to 'Authority" over a life time makes people literally stupid and dishonest. They can't even figure out what is right or wrong, not when Authority comes calling. 'Deference and Obedience...that's right. Thinking and questioning...that's wrong'.
They never learn to practice and trust their own reasoned judgements about anything controversial.
But how could I possibly know all that to be true? I am only one man. I know it BECAUSE I can think and have noticed throughout life that others do not; and because occasionally I do encounter some individual in person who exhibits willingness and ability to think.
I also know it because I understand that we live in the age of the PostModern. Modernity, the age of the rise of reason, is largely past now. To borrow phrasing from Ayn Rand, reason is today an outcast, and nearly an outlaw.
Naturally, in this age of Postmodernity, reason is mistrusted and maligned and devotion to Authority is ascending. This causes tyranny, because individual freedom requires individual thinking among people with lives of their own. People today mostly want to be led and fed. They feel that policy of life is 'practical'.
When people long for a collective mind to (somehow) supplant their own individual responsibility to question and think, they will support tyranny. They will gravitate toward the "civic virtue" of "public health" and the myth of viruses. It feels right to them.
Sorry about excessive length of my comment.
I hear you. My stance is that all the ways people do not want to know, seem "stupid," want to blindly obey, etc., are due to programming and conditioning. This is not how human beings are inherently. We have been subjected to manipulation and control for a long time on this planet. And if that's the case, there's some real, true humanness underneath all that programming that could rise to the surface. It is my hope and belief that this is possible. That's why I refuse to write off anyone for not wanting to know the truth.
THanks, the one's worth spending time presenting data and reasoning to are precisely those willing to think. The others do not influence anyone, except maybe some other passives.
Their ego is tied to their knowledge. So they are trapped. They cannot see the truth that comes from a person who has no political power.
Interestingly 'The Deciders who Know' anagrams to this only two word phrase:
- hoodwinked wretches
I was very pro-vaccine and believed in germ theory right up to hearing a Dr Andrew Wakefield interview about a connection between the MMR shots and autism around 2016. I was stunned by what he was saying, and he sounded so believable and trustworthy, yet a Google search found so many full of criticism of him! All were only ad hominem attacks, with zero providing a counterargument that made any sense as to why this doctor may be wrong.
I dug further and found evidence from the mainstream was very confusing and contradictory and seemingly deliberately so, hence the movie VAXXED being so successful. That was the first time I knew that the media was lying about vaccines, and it really woke me up to look into what else they are lying about when it comes to vaccines, especially. I will not accept being lied to, especially when related to health, so I went from very pro-vaccine to completely against all vaccines, which are all poisons in my mind.
Since that time I also no longer believe that any virus exists, as none has scientifically been proven to exist, and also don't believe in the germ theory nonsense.
My wake-up moment was Andrew Wakefield in 2016. I would love to hear when others first woke up to this fraud.
Also, regarding "why intelligent, thoughtful people are so resistant to this information" – the first thing is, why are they happy to be lied to? Surely, as "intelligent" people, they cannot be so weak-minded as to not see that we are being lied to. Don't they care? Intelligence without wisdom is not much good at all. "Intelligent" alone is good for nothing if it leads you to walk off a cliff while ignoring several flashing red warning signs warning you to turn around or stop.
It's good you woke up, even by Wakefield, but Dr. Wake was a dog and pony show. They needed something to quell the masses, not us who have already woken up, nor you, ready to wake up.
This was just around the same time the CDC was realizing that a correlation between autism and vaccines was going to be hard to keep a lid on.
Dr. Wake was a hopium hero that led to the massive and successful bashing of anti-vax that we still see today. He was one of Albert Pikes’, “we supply heroes” for the masses.
Here Dr. Wake has worked with Dazak,
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/instance/499879/pdf/jclinpath00253-0035.pdf
pushing virus existence, and his paper that led to the media storm was also virus pushing: https://www.thelancet.com/pdfs/journals/lancet/PIIS0140-6736(97)11096-0.pdf
He has never rescinded his claims of working with viruses even in Covid times.
What happened to Wakefield? He and the anti-vax movement was slandered to death with many believing anti-vax was crazy. He became very popular.
https://tinyurl.com/34mx6zfy
To me this WAS THE PURPOSE. It was a reverse-psycology propaganda trick.
Very interesting, what you say, and I totally agree. Regarding "He [Dr Wakefield] has never rescinded his claims of working with viruses even in Covid times," this has always disappointed me about Dr Wakefield. Despite the serious harms he discovered from the MMR shots, he is still pro-vaccine! For that, I have not listened to anything he has said for several years now. Your "dog and pony show" description seems to make sense, even though I'm still thankful, of course, that Dr Wakefield woke me up as I'm not sure anyone else could have at that time – yes, I was that pro-vaccine!
The term 'anti-vax' is nonsense, of course, when you know the true history of vaccines and their great harms, and that germ theory is and always has been a psyop. Sadly, though, the majority do seem to believe 'anti-vax' equates to stupid or ignorant when in reality those believing that are the real ignorant or stupid ones. Many have woken up since "Covid", of course, though the vast majority, I believe, still think that vaccines are somehow necessary for our survival! Yes, they are that ignorant/stupid.
I believe the term "anti-vax" was coined by the industry to try to maintain the narrative, just as "conspiracy theory" was coined by the CIA to discredit anyone who dissented from the official narrative around JFK's assassination. I read that the term "anti-vax" started to show up around 15 years ago--maybe there was a drop in vaccine uptake around then, not sure. But far in advance of Covid, this term was being sharpened for use.
You may be right on that as "anti-vax" has certainly been weaponised to make people believe only a lunatic would think that vaccines have not been the great saviour of mankind and saved millions of lives etc! When you know the truth about vaccines and their great harms and that they have never saved a single person as poison doesn't heal but only harm then you know that the term "anti-vax" is something to be happy to be labelled not ashamed of. Ignorant people will not see this though, and sadly the vast majority likely close to 99% are like that. The ones that do their research go anti-vax, those that don't remain ignorant and will pay the price at some point with their health as many did from 2021 especially when the poison shots were being rolled out. But hey, we were all ignorant at some point so I will not call anyone for that but only if they are told the truth on vaccines but simply ignore it - then little hope for those people sadly.
Note there is no Anti-Ultrasound movement. Anti-vax is real, but a gate-keeping narrative.
I look forward to the continuation of your three part series.
Simply put, we have been bamboozled!
Propaganda is alive and well, and we must maintain our critical thinking skills.
Thank you for your informative and thoughtful writings!
I only found Wakefield way later. But saw both vaxxed films. This is somewhat 7 years ago, and by then I was already wondering about jabs. Then I bought dissolving Illusions. And today I got a copy of Poisoned needle. Started reading immediately. the truth has been known for more than 100 years. But money... as Mrs McBean states, what keeps you healthy costs nothing, and all these doctors want macmansions and beemers...
I've seen both vaxxed films too and would always recommend vaxxed 2 to anyone questioning whether a link exists. Vaxxed 1 proved the CDC found a link and tried to cover it up and bury it and is still denying a link to this day even though it was 100% proven by themselves! Vaxxed 2 is of course the parents' stories version with so many horror stories from mums and dads who saw the serious harms develop in their young children, often immediately after taking the poison, which is no surprise when you know what you know. You are aware of course having seen these films so just commenting in case anyone hasn't seen v1 or v2.
Those two books, Dissolving Illusions and The Poisoned Needle, are a great recommendation, as they really do show the truth about vaccines, what really makes us ill, and the fear porn, disinformation, gaslighting, hypocrisy, etc. that was alive and well from the governments, doctors and MSM all those years ago just as today.
Eleanor McBean was trying to inform as many as possible and had to write her book as she knew the people were being lied to. What a brave woman and incredible human being she was, and her book should be read my everyone - especially the weak-minded "I'm not anti-vax" lot.
Absolutely. Mine is not the authentic book but a new large format reprint, which I love because of it! Just unbelievable how doctors, nurses, organizations are continuing to poison people all the while this is known for so long. If that does not prove the ill will of those, what does?
Exactly, and many doctors and nurses were still pushing the "Covid" poison jabs long after the deaths and serious harms had been reported. No doubt they were not telling their patients of the proven risks from that jab but only to get their sleeve rolled up - pure evil, and they know it. In a sane world, those doctors and nurses would be behind bars for the rest of their lives with the worst of them facing the death penalty.
Regarding reprinting of books, I love that it's so easy to get a reprint of a book and have done that myself from an old book and plan to do again soon.
I agree with you
I woke up in June 2020 with the Covid fraud. I had been ambivalent about vaccines thinking they were of some use but not for the 'flu as people fell ill anyway. I have not had a vaccine for over 30 years if not 45.
The whole virology and vaccines fraud came crashing down in that June, and I realised how badly we had been deceived. I am now exceedingly angry about it and why I set up my WordPress site that same month, coming also to substack in April 2023.
I was undergoing immunotherapy that year (another story) and it was that experience that helped me understand what was going on. The cancer industry is another scam.
Yes, the cancer industry is indeed another scam - so many scams and so many people still believing in them, sadly. I think most people who have woken up are like you in that they did around 2020 - as the level of manipulation we were going through was off the charts so quite easy for all but the weak-minded to seriously question what we were being told. One of my sisters and I were awoken to the many scams years earlier, but others in my family or friends either did not wake up or did so in 2020/21. Great that you have created your own website, as good way forward and know many others have done this to help get the word out. Youtube of course is the best for reach but toxic for free speech with many genuine comments being removed with hysterical level shadowbanning going on there.
Then go a step forward and find that Wakefield, and fellows, are gatekeepers.
Thank you for your writing(s); well written. I'm not sure I understand how it is that I came around to real-eyes'ing, five years ago, that we are lied to; I remember, six years ago I guess, my step-mother and I were talking on the phone, as this 'plague' was beginning to shut the world down, and she was telling me this is all a lie, information were hearing just isn't true. I recall that I was rolling my eyes at her, as she was talking about articles she read and videos she watched, and I asked her if she would send me her links (I was believing everything that was happening and hanging on to the media's narrative). She sent me the links, I started reading them and, well...the rest is history for me. (I am married and can't say the same awakening happened for my husband!)
I'm glad to hear this! I have attempted to send my son information, and he doesn't look at it. I was thinking of him when I wrote that I get the reaction, "I know you're not crazy, but you've had some wild ideas in the past so I think this is just one more of those." It's frustrating!
I think I'm learning that no matter what you simply cannot get through to people. You have all the opportunity in the world to get through to people close to you such as your son and no matter how much discussion, how much information you won't get through. And yes, it's incredibly frustrating for those of us who value rational thought.
I still have hope of getting through to my son! And maybe others.
There is a simple thought experiment anyone can do to test the germ hypothesis (even though the germ hypothesis was roundly defeated EVERY.SINGLE.TIME.IT.WAS.TESTED if you bother consulting the scientific research but whatevs). It goes as follows:
Imagine you were told black lung disease is a real disease and is a consequence of inhaling coal dust. Thus, you would expect that coal miners would get this disease, to the exclusion of almost everyone else.
But imagine, on your surprise, that coal miners - or coal refiners, or anyone else in a coal-focused industry (steel, etc.) - didn't get this disease any more often than anyone else. And, in fact, perhaps preschool teachers "got it" more often, despite an almost total lack of exposure to the causative agent.
To the dullest person, this would be a clue: "We must have misattributed the cause of this disease!"
But to the smartest person, it would become yet more evidence of the rock-solid evidence of the "coal hypothesis."
It's the same with germs. Do doctors and nurses get sick much more often than everyone else - and, if germ hypothesis were correct, should get sick multiple times per year with 99.9999% certainty? No, they don't. They interact with sick people pretty much, literally, as in literally literally, 8 hours per day. Every day. They are dealing with "contagious" patients all day as part of their jobs. Now add in pharmacists and basically anyone in retail who has to deal with supposedly "contagious" customers all day long.
And nothing happens. They don't get sick any more or less often than anyone else does, even though - according to the hypothesis - they probably should all be dead now.
That should be the end of the discussion. But it's not for a lot of people, and that's because science is fake and people don't understand what thinking is. Science - in ideal terms - is a process of thinking about empirical evidence (abbreviated definition). Science - in actual terms - is a faith-based religious belief system that scorns thinking and is essentially a very complicated way of performing auguries and rationalizing contradictory evidence, sometimes by using really hefty math equations that are imaginatively interpreted. Education - in actual terms - is the process of destroying your ability to think.
Good point! "Oh but they have great immunity from being around sick people all the time." is the usual silly reply.
But but but you still need the convid vaxx‼️‼️it’s all circus.
The following is a transcription from a claimed psychiatrist on her lessons learned over ten years--sorry, no attribution available. For what it’s worth:
“You’re brain doesn’t believe what’s true. It believes what you repeat. Your thoughts shape your feelings. Your feelings drive your actions and your actions become your identity. Your brain is always receiving, so who you are is changeable. Say something often enough with enough emotion and your brain starts to believe it. That’s why self-talk really matters. It’s not harmless, it’s extremely powerful. It’s like casting a spell your brain and body can overhear. The way you speak to yourself shapes how you feel about yourself. And your life will always reflect who you think you are. Your brain doesn’t know the difference between real and imagined. So, when you visualize the calm capable version of yourself, you’re literally rewiring your brain for it. You don’t own your thoughts, they visit you! You don’t have to believe all of them. You can’t think yourself out of a feeling, but you can feel your way into a new way of thinking. Emotions that don’t get processed stay stored in your nervous system. Your body always keeps a score. Most of behavior is automatic, it’s subconscious. Your brain guesses what’s next based on old experiences. If you change the data, you can change the future.”
There are so many ways we can be manipulated or persuaded of something--even by our own selves! It's important to know this.
Wow, that makes so much sense. I'm my own worst critic (aren't most women? 😉), and I need to talk nicer to myself.
Those dang stored emotions will be the death of me. 🤨😮💨
I too have wondered, what makes me different that I can entertain and inevitably accept this concept?
The mind-expanding realization that viruses don't exist was the first of several other logical fallacies that I discovered I had wrongly believed. Then I began to wonder if these weren't actually fallacies and that perhaps there is something about my personality that likes to be right and have some kind of hidden knowledge that separates me from the rest of society. Like a wannabe gnostic. Maybe it goes back to being the only kid who knew Santa was a lie...
But no, that can't be it, because they are fallacies and I know it. I just share the info with very few people because I know most won't even consider it. And no one I have told has accepted it. Thanks for sharing this article.
The book The Invisible Rainbow talks about how doctors during the 1918 flu injected saliva of "infected" persons with a syringe into the mouth of people and horses, and the injected did not get sick. Once I started looking at illness as the body's way of detoxing, and viruses as a symptom, not a cause, this shifted my mindset. What do you think about exosomes/ viral particles as a symptom?
What you say about experiments to prove contagion is so true. Daniel Roytas' book Can You Catch A Cold? analyzes hundreds--yes, hundreds--of studies about contagion over the past more than 100 years, and none of them found evidence that sick people or animals make healthy ones sick. Not even using the excruciatingly unnatural exposure routes that they have studied. This should be a slam-dunk against the germ theory, but somehow this information has been hiding in plain sight all this time.
On the subject of exosomes, they are not symptoms of anything. They are, as I understand it, particles of dead cell matter. Viruses also aren't any kind of symptom. It is the process of detoxing that produces symptoms as the body's elimination pathways are ramped up to push out what shouldn't be in the body, i.e. toxins and the dead cells they have killed.
There's no virus involved in detox symptoms. Viruses are fictional entities imagined into (fake) existence by hubristic scientists like Louis Pasteur who decided that symptoms could be defined as different diseases, and if they were caused by different microbes, there was a mint to be made on hundreds of different vaccines. It has pleased and benefited the Rockefeller medicine people, who took control of medicine in the early 20th century, to maintain this falsity to also make billions on patented pharmaceuticals and keep people feeling dependent on them.
Since viruses have never been found, and can't possibly be found through the methodology currently in use, as far as we know they do not exist. Maybe they'll be found someday, but I highly doubt it.
Thanks for mentioning Roytas' book, I was looking for a compilation of studies proving contagion is a myth.
Allow me a little correction of what you wrote.
Mixing definitions makes it extremely hard for ppl to get convinced.
For a starter. Virus does exist, but not in the way they want you to believe it. Virus is old Greek for poison, they spread airborne by Chemtrails and nebulizing or through food and drinks, so not some mystical germ that is dead but still can replicate (Alice in... any?)
Then you have the Flue / influenza, also hangover, vomiting, diarrhea which is the process of detoxifying the body of the virus (poison)
Keep things straight and logical.
What you say is 100% true. But "chemical poison" is not the definition of "virus" in our time. Virus as a tiny entity that replicates in cells causing disease and death is what doesn't exist.
I disagree, that the cabal twisted the definition does not change the meaning of the word virus. I believe if you explain this the the non believers, it will be easier to understand that they have been played. It also makes it more logic why we get the flue. The body detoxes with the following symptoms.
With all due respect, I disagree. I have written many articles about what symptoms are and why the body needs to detox. My whole Substack is about this. In my view it is confusing to talk about virus with a definition most people have never heard of. The whole world was shut down and millions, maybe billions of people took an experimental injection trying to protect themselves from a virus that does not exist--a virus in the current, incorrect but accepted definition. The information that virus has a different definition is new to almost everyone. The current meaning is what needs to be dispelled.
''Since viruses have never been found, and can't possibly be found through the methodology currently in use, as far as we know they do not exist. Maybe they'll be found someday, but I highly doubt it.''
And Unicorns? Leprechauns?
I have much more sense that it's possible unicorns, leprechauns, dragons, and the like are real than that viruses will ever be found.
Roman, viruses are ONLY A CONCEPT that had died on the starting line. They are conceptually defined as an infectious particle about 150nm in size with genetic material that codes for itself and a protein coat that replicates in cells and spreads from host to host and causes disease. This kind of particle has never been found-you have to be careful to even suggest they exist as that promotes the propaganda Betsy notes undermines society.
An exosome is a vesicle derived from the membranous material of a cell also near 150nm, there is no protein coat. It may have genetic material in it but that material is not coding for itself. It is not infectious nor replicates inside of cells nor destroys them. The body makes them all the time for communication, for detox, and when cells die.
👉This is the genome scam explained
https://protonmagic.substack.com/p/fan-wu-toilet-paper-rolls
👉And this is the cell culture scam explained
https://protonmagic.substack.com/p/kary-mullis-channeled-in-from-valhalla
The "viruses" found are dead cell debris.
With the rise of genetic sequencing, they say we're made up of viruses. Hmmm, right?
It's that viruses are normal cells and have the broken sequences that they misunderstand.
But the dead cell material is not a virus. It's what they see in electron microscope pictures that they point to with arrows and say, "virus," but that is not a virus as it is currently being defined. Just to clarify.
I think you're right, Roman. With the way “viruses” are so-called DNA fragments it makes sense that they are actually indicative of the body discharging or detoxing something, not the cause of the illness as assumed.
''and viruses as a symptom, not a cause,''
Do you believe that viruses exist?
Not in the traditional sense, that's what I'm teasing out here with Betsy.
I think it may be a mistake to call dead cell material "viruses." This word already has had its meaning changed from "poison" to "half-alive predatory entity that parasitizes healthy cells." I'm for not muddying the water further by calling something else, i.e. material from broken cells, a virus. Plus, I would not call the presence of dead cell material a "symptom" in any case. To me, symptoms are physical experiences--congestion, coughing, vomiting, skin rash, fever, etc. Dead cellular material happens on a level way below our awareness so it really isn't a symptom. My opinion.
I can see understandable reasons for people maintaining belief in viruses/contagion however fraudulent the science:
1. There is no clear cut alternative cause provided for colds and flu.
2. There is a very strong sense of contagion, for example, it feels very much to parents that the reason they have a cold is that they caught it from their child who got sick from illness "going around" in their pre-school.
Why they maintain belief in other lies when there are very good alternative explanations is another matter.
Unfortunately, what is required is what most people don't have: an open mind.
Understanding logical fallacies is certainly no guarantee: Dr Bo Bennett runs the site logicallyfallacious.com and totally follows the mainstream narrative on everything as do the self-described group of critical thinking experts (including academics at the University of Queensland and Jesse Richardson (founder of sites yourfallacy.is and yourbias.is)) who have produced truly appalling gamified tests at conspiracytest.org which aim to coax you out of your conspiracy thinking.
I have written two perfectly rational and civil responses to the conspiracytest.org website and emailed them to the 10 people in the group with zero response. This is despite Jesse making the point that intellectual humility is of such great importance.
https://petraliverani.substack.com/p/intellectual-humility-test-for-the
https://petraliverani.substack.com/p/what-if-spreading-conspiracy-theories
This is what Jesse says ... while steadfastly refusing to engage with me. It truly does my head in.
https://youtu.be/9c9XA7O0gao?si=4Px00j7i4kbid7pn&t=582
" … we are emotional and social creatures first and rational creatures very much second … it’s really the mindset we go into things in the first place that really matters because you can weaponise fallacies and use them to close down arguments and be more irrational if you’re that way inclined. It really takes intellectual humility and being honest with yourself to be able to be receptive and to progress both personally and collectively to a better place."
Thanks!
"This is the abiding question of the past six years. Why did some of us find it possible to see through the lies when so many were taken in? What is different about us? Finding some answers to this might help us in our quest to get through to those who do not want to know. The fact that I was able to overcome the inertia of this narrative, along with many, many others, is still a puzzle to me."
Yes, this is the abiding question isn't it Betsy? You and I have asked this of each other so many times. I'm glad that you brought it up here. I'm wondering if there is some common thread among all of us, but I doubt that is the case. I hearken back to my own awakening regarding the virus. But I think I was one step ahead of the game from the get go. I had questioned JFK, Vietnam, 911, and others. I had also questioned health dogma - circumcision, medicated childbirth, vaccines (although not thoroughly enough to save my children and not totally myself, until now) I quit getting mammograms and refused statins, though very qualified to take them, giving my cholesterol level.
Still, like you said, belief in the virus is so very deeply embedded. Why would I ever question that? I never heard of anyone who had done so. My own awakening began with Zach Bush, who told such a beautiful story of viruses actually being part of a natural evolution of the human body. To update us, to make us healthier (or something to that effect) Not sure now how he ever came to that conclusion - certainly not scientifically, but it was a great story.
At the time I was receiving regular posts from Michael Mendizza, who had spread the work of Joseph Chilton Pierce (Crack in the Cosmic Egg) He introduced me to Tom Cowan and Sally Fallon's book, "The Contagion Myth". I vacillated then between what Zach had to say and the new thought of "no virus". How could that be so? But logic and the knowledge of the propensity of harm from Western medicine won out.
I look back to my childhood to figure out why I question so much. Raised by strong Catholics, I was strictly adherent until young adulthood. hmmm. I was strongly told to stand up for my beliefs. Is there something to that? To stand up for what is "right"? Does that also mean that to know what is "right" means to continually ask that question of oneself?
I am also a very logical thinker. Was that part of my birthright?
Anyway, I've gone on kind of a deep search of my own psyche here. My own search probably doesn't apply to others, but it is my contribution to how are some of us are able to see through the lies.
Thanks, Betsy. Your contributions to the virus story are invaluable.
Another possible commonality I've heard is being on the outside as children and teens, not being so inclined to "follow the crowd." Or being "old souls" who have seen all this before. I don't know if there is an answer to this, really--perhaps it's just the luck of the draw, or being in the right place at the right time to hear or read one fact that opened our minds to question everything, or connected with something in us that was ready to hear that.
I, too, was charmed by Zach Bush's lyrical story of how viruses have been responsible for some leaps of evolution, such as the fact that women have a uterus. But I never heard him offer any evidence for these claims. How does he know viruses helped us have uteruses? Where is the evidence of their contributing to evolution? (I have my doubts about that narrative too.) Especially, where is the evidence if viruses have not even been found, or if they are "neither dead nor alive" but somewhere in between. How does that work, exactly?
In the end, I had to go with the more "science-y" folks--Drs. Cowan, Kaufman, Sam and Mark Bailey, and Mike Stone, Christine Massey etc.--who are simply asking for the scientific evidence that viruses have ever been found and isolated. All they get--even me, from some commenters--is ad hominem attacks, appeals to authority, and strawman arguments (e.g., bacteria do so exist and are visible in microscopes! Yeah, that's not what I'm talking about here). There is never any effort to address the questions that are raised, at least I've never seen it. Which in itself is highly suspect. If you have the evidence, just show it to us and we'll shut up! But they don't. And the ad hominem stuff can be vicious.
Something about your comment resonated with me, Rose. I'm not sure what because only in the past 5 years have I started seeing all of the lies, so I'm a bit behind. I also wasn't raised Catholic, nor told to stand up for what feels right, and I don't call myself a "logical thinker." However, I do have an open mind, and I believe that is why I can see the truth. Just don't understand what took me so long. 🤔 Glad I finally arrived - I have so much to learn! Thank you for listing some of the names of those who you have learned from, for I will be reading up on them.
Oh, one thing that I really related to is searching for my own psyche.. Why I do the things I do... What shaped my way of thinking? I have spent a lot of time trying to understand others, especially those who make tragic life choices. It has always fascinated me, but now I would like to understand myself better so that I can heal. ☺️
Misty, I didn't mean to imply that being raised Catholic had something to do with my questioning. Possibly my long ago Mennonite ancestors had something to do with my taking the path less traveled by. My Catholic folks and grandmother instilled in me a strong moral sense but they didn't necessarily ask questions. I did want to do the "right" thing, even if that made me different from others.
I think there is no common thread among all of us who find ourselves in this beautiful, yet difficult place of questioning the virus. That is as it should be. We are all unique human beings. We have found a common alliance. I am so grateful to all of you for finding your way to this experience we share.
I have always been amazed by people's lack of curiosity. They want to be force fed simple ideas and don't want to go to the effort to think and explore for themselves about anything complex. They also don't want to cut themselves off from the herd. It is especially hard to get university educated people to go against what they are told continually are the opinions of good, smart people.
I would suggest this is because of life conditions (e.g., poverty, trauma, etc.) that affect families not to instill these values in children, along with education that actively teaches us not to have curiosity but to accept what we are told and parrot it back. I don't believe lack of curiosity is a human trait. It is a conditioned response.
Hi Betsy,
Newcomer to your Substack. Very interesting article. I was thinking about why some people are open-minded about viruses and others seem so convinced that they are right. I would like to offer my perspective.
As I reflect on my own journey, the thing that stands out is that early on, I deviated from the path that society laid out for me. Every step of the way, I followed the path less traveled. For example, at age 17, I joined the Marine Corps after dropping out of high school. Received my GED after serving as a grunt in Vietnam. After my service, mostly under the GI Bill, I managed to go to college for 14 years continuously through summer school. And then, continuing my deviance, managed to spread my education across 3+ Masters despite the many admonitions to obtain just one PhD.
Along the way, I learned that in a real sense, we live in a matrix. One of my Masters is in Philosophy. There are two valuable disciplines embedded within Philosophy: Logic and Philosophy of Science. This background has shaped my independent thinking.
Accordingly, I see red flags when I read that vaccine trials are usually done without a proper control group. Or that the independent variable is assumed to be contained in a swab taken from an infected person before culturing in a petri dish. Or that the Cytopathic Effect is indirect proof of the presence of a virus. And so on. From my perspective, these examples highlight that the edifice of Virology is a house of cards. But the most astonishing thing of all is the length of time that this pseudo-paradigm has been allowed to wear the mantle of science.
If only more people knew what real science looks like and how it's done, we would not be so easy to fool. Virology is only one scientific field of many that are not conducted rigorously and are not even based on anything real but only on guesswork and inference. Yet we must "trust the science" and not ever question it! It's religion.
I am still in the process of grasping they don't. If you have lived with the idea for 60+ years and then come across something totally different, it is hard to understand. I bought a Bechamp book 2 years ago but it was very hard to read. But the more I read, the more it seems obvious. In fact, it seems Pasteur at the end of his life confessed the fraud, but by then, the narrative was fixed and no one seems to have tried another path. There are bacteria and funghi, which we can see, some even with the bare eye. I read about the experiments to make healthy people sick that lead nowhere. The fact that sometimes you 'catch' something and other times you don't, proves that contagion is not an explanation. been in houses with sick people quite often without 'catching it'.
And there are lots of times where we don't even remember being with someone who was sick and not getting sick! Nothing happened, so there's nothing to remember.
Two things enabled me to move away from the belief in viruses.
(1) In the 8th grade, a teacher encouraged me to read philiosophy books. Ever since, I've been interested in philosophy and logical argumentation. Since I've never found any evidence that viruses exist, I simply cannot believe that viruses exist.
(2) I installed several computer systems for billing in blood labs, where the 1st machines/robots completed blood tests. I was shocked, because none of the doctors showed the slightest interest about whether the results of the blood tests were correct, but all of the doctors responsible for these blood labs wanted extensive testing to ensure that every single blood test completed was charged to someone or some health insurance company. In addition, those doctors all read newspaper articles and magazines about winning in the stock market or earning more by investing in real estate. I never saw a medical book or journal in any of those blood test labs. That changed my view about medical doctors!
I see 'Medical doctors' anagrams to:
- at crocodiles MD
Seems fair.
because the indoctrination runs deep