'Viruses' are the key Jenga block

Pull it out, and the rest of the control narratives come falling down

Last week I saw an article from the Washington Post that exemplifies one of the reasons why it is so important for us to understand clearly that “viruses” do not exist and that the entire paradigm of the disproven germ hypothesis and contagion is wrong. This paradigm is continuing to lead us down false pathways of fear and disempowerment at a time when it couldn’t be more critically important that we not allow ourselves to follow those dead ends.

As I deconstruct the article, I hope it will become evident why I say that understanding the nonexistence of “viruses” can change everything. “Viruses” and the idea that bacteria cause “contagious” disease are fundamental building blocks of how we understand not just the way our own bodies work, but how life works on our planet. Removing these fraudulent ideas from our paradigm for navigating life is like pulling out the key block on the bottom of the Jenga tower. In this article, we will see several of those other Jenga blocks and how they rest on “viruses” and the disproven germ hypothesis. These are intertwined narratives, to switch metaphors, that we need to stop believing and start dismantling or unravelling (whichever is your preferred metaphor. I like them both).

Photo by John Cameron on Unsplash

The article, which reported on a study published in the journal Nature (and which the WaPo article did not name so I had to find it in order to link it here), started out thusly:

Climate change raises pandemic risk

As humans degrade earth’s environment, we have created a world in which diseases may be increasingly apt to fester and multiply.

I’d call it ironic if I didn’t know it was intentional: this article, in purportedly warning people about the consequences of continuing on the path we are on, leads us further down that path by purveying the false idea that we are subject to “diseases” emanating from the Earth’s environment, when no such thing occurs. Then again, that’s what propaganda does—its purpose is to lead us in the wrong direction. The article also starts right out raising fear—”degrade,” “fester and multiply”—to keep people in victim mode, another propaganda technique. Notice this throughout the article: the language choices that are designed to raise fear and stress. Notice also the implication that everything that is going wrong is our fault— “humans degrade,” “we have created a world....”

The article went on:

Infection-spreading creatures such as mosquitoes and ticks are thriving on a planet warmed by a blanket of fossil fuel emissions. When pollution, hunting or development push rare organisms to extinction, parasites proliferate because they have evolved to target the most abundant species.

Where to even start with the problems in these two sentences?

The first sentence invokes the false notion of contagion, and adds a layer of falsehood by mis-identifying mosquitoes and ticks as vectors of “infectious disease.” Unlike “viruses,” the microscopic parasite called plasmodium that supposedly causes malaria and is supposedly spread by mosquitoes has been identified. However, very much like “viruses,” plasmodium has never been proven to cause a disease called “malaria” nor to be spread via mosquito bites.

The symptoms of malaria, as explained by Mike Stone in his article The Malaria Malady, are indistinguishable from symptoms of almost any other so-called “infectious disease” that has been identified with a specific name, including “Covid-19”: fever, body aches, sore throat, headache, and fatigue, along with possible nausea and diarrhea. Interestingly, starting in 2020 there were very few cases of “Covid-19” in African countries where malaria is commonly diagnosed and has been for many years.

The Malaria Malady

Ticks, too, have been mislabeled as disease vectors. Because ticks are venomous arachnids, tick bites can cause severe reactions in some people, but this has nothing to do with “germs” or “disease.” The narrative that they carry a bacteria that causes “Lyme disease” with its indeterminate variety of sometimes debilitating symptoms has been questioned by many in the terrain community, for the same reasons that all diseases and conditions that have been attributed to bacteria and “viruses” are being questioned. How does a named disease have such a wide range of symptoms that it can’t by diagnosed by symptoms, but only by the fact or suspicion of a tick bite? Here is Sam Bailey’s video about what may be going on with “Lyme disease.”

The Lyme Disease Lie

Parasites—what are they really?

The article also made some claims about parasites. I have been unable with brief searches to find corroboration of its claim that “parasites have evolved to target the most abundant species,” but I am suspicious of it. And since I can’t access the Washington Post article to see the link that apparently is attached to those words, I can’t see what their reference is (a friend sent me the article, no live links in it).

The word “parasites” carries the same scary aura as the word “viruses,” at least until we know that “viruses” don’t exist. Parasites do exist, but are they really vampiric, as we’re told, feeding on us and sucking our blood like little predators? Or do they have another purpose? Some supporting the terrain view of health and disease are suggesting that parasites have a role in our bodies similar to that of bacteria: to clean up damage. Parasites, they say, do not attack healthy organs and tissues, but show up when heavy metals are present in harmful quantities. They are there to detox these substances.

I plan to do an article on parasites, where I will present more of the evidence for this notion of what they are doing in us, which is likely quite a stretch from what you probably think. It certainly was and still is for me. For now, an article from 2007 about this same issue as it shows up in sharks came across my screen recently, cited in a Substack post on Ivermectin (thanks, Agent131711). Rather synchronously, this article appeared in Nature News, a non-scholarly publication by the same journal that carried the one about climate change and pandemic risk that the Washington Post article reported on. The shark article said that ocean researchers had been looking for mechanisms that various forms of marine life use to avoid absorbing lethal amounts of heavy metals from their highly polluted ocean environment.

Their research involved killing some sharks and analyzing the heavy metals in their tissues and also in the parasites lodged in their intestines. They found concentrations of heavy metals in the sharks’ tapeworms that were 300 to 400 times higher than in the shark’s own tissues. The tapeworms were sequestering the heavy metals away from the sharks’ tissues so the toxic metals did not kill the sharks. (Of course, it didn’t do these sharks any good—they were saved by the tapeworms from death due to heavy metals, but they died at the hands of researchers. Justified? What do you think?)

‘Climate change’—or is it ‘global warming’?

“A planet warmed by a blanket of fossil fuel emissions” is a nice turn of phrase, but, as with virology and malaria and Lyme disease, questions are now being raised as to the legitimacy of the “climate change” narrative and even whether it is accurate to call petroleum products “fossil fuels.” If you are one who is still accepting that human activity such as driving cars is causing the planet’s climate to warm, I would suggest that you look for some non-mainstream sources of information about this.

Here is the Corbett Report podcast from 2015 that convinced me about the complete fraud of the “climate change” or “global warming” narrative. Corbett has many other podcasts on the topic, and you can check out some of his sources for more information.

Human-caused harm

The article continued:

And then there are the harms caused when humans introduce nonnative plants and animals or chemicals such as herbicides and fungicides to fragile ecosystems. That exacerbates losses in biodiversity that leave surviving populations more vulnerable to illness, according to research published Wednesday in the journal Nature.

Note the rhetoric of not only fear, but more guilt—humans are causing “harms” to “fragile ecosystems.” The implication is that the losses in biodiversity are our fault. Some humans are definitely causing harm, but it’s important to note that these earth-harming and biodiversity-reducing activities are mostly being carried out at the behest of the owners of giant corporations that have been controlling economies for a long, long time.

The use of poisons to grow food and the heavy use of toxic industrial chemicals in manufacturing and mining are without doubt doing serious damage to earth and causing species extinctions, and this goes on without anyone ever having asked for our consent. Also contributing to the devastation are massive clearcutting of forests and filling in of wetlands as well as the hideous proliferation of plastics that are killing ocean creatures and land creatures both and are lodged in the tissues of every human on Earth. Chemical mining is toxifying water and devastating ecosystems all over the world. And EMFs must be included, as they are interfering with insects’ navigation systems and wreaking the same cellular havoc on wildlife as they are on us.

We as individuals are complicit to a degree, because we use plastic and buy products made using toxic substances and processes. Many humans misguidedly continue to use poisons in their fields, gardens, lawns, and homes. We are responsible for those things.

At the same time, these products are a huge economic engine. Companies produce billions of tons of them every year, and millions upon millions of dollars are spent advertising these kinds of products to farmers as well as gardeners and everyone who has a kitchen or a bathroom. And then, after being persuaded to use these poisons, we are blamed for the harm they cause! It’s also important to note that the narratives that persuade us to use chemical pesticides are 100% based in the disproven germ hypothesis—seeing insects and weeds as pests to be destroyed exactly as we are taught to see “germs” as pests that need to be destroyed. I wrote about this issue a month or so ago.

This highlights what is behind the narrative of inducing us to feel guilty about the choices we make every day. On one level, yes, we are responsible for our choices and actions, and we need to be aware of the impacts of everything we do. And as anyone who has tried to make different choices knows, very often there are no other viable options available. We are “damned if we do and damned if we don’t.”

So we arrive at the iconic Pogo cartoon from 1971, “We have met the enemy and he is us.” This is exactly where the globalists want us—feeling that it’s all our fault, that human beings are a cancer on the face of the planet, that it is human nature to be greedy and destructive and not care. We are the enemy. Somebody needs to control us or we’ll destroy the planet. I know! A one-world government, where the small group of superior humans who are smarter and stronger than the rest of us will make the rules and ensure that we behave. The New World Order. Right where they want us.

Believing this “humans are bad” narrative may even make us more amenable to a population cull, because there’s way too many of us already (the over-population narrative is closely linked here), and we just wreck everything we touch. The planet would be better off without us. It almost makes me cry to think how many years I felt this way about our species. It’s pure propaganda. It was propaganda from the beginning when the Club of Rome decided in the early 1970s that its gambit for a new world order would be to convince us that “it’s all our fault.” (I can’t find a source for this but I’ll keep looking—anyone who has it, please post in comments. Thanks!)

‘A hotter world’—really? And if so, why?

Returning to the article, it describes how the research that linked “climate change” to “pathogenic” parasites compared hundreds of studies and thousands of observations of all kinds of creatures to reach its conclusions.

The analysis reinforced the findings of many of those inquiries: that a hotter world of ravaged ecosystems is one that is more hospitable to many parasites, and less so to humans and other life.

The connection appeared with all types of infections and their hosts, suggesting that as the planet continues to warm and humans continue to disrupt nature, increases in disease spread "will be consistent and widespread," said Jason Rohr, a professor of biological sciences at the University of Notre Dame and one of the study's authors. The link was just as clear with humans as it was with wildlife and plants, he added.

"That is despite all the efforts we’re making to control and prevent diseases," Rohr said.

If the world is getting hotter, it is not due to anthropogenic climate change, but to solar cycles that have a familiar pattern (see the video by James Corbett linked above). Some suggest that aerial spraying, sometimes called geoengineering or “chemtrails,” is at least partly responsible for raising the planet’s temperature, and may actually be the main cause of it. I don’t have any research to share on this, so I just mention it as something to think about. Especially since one of the purported reasons for the spraying is to dim the sun as a way to reduce the warming that the spraying may be causing in the first place. Take that for what it’s worth. (I call it utterly insane and perhaps tied with 5G for the most heinous activity of the control freaks in their bid to subdue us.)

And the point that “diseases” are caused by “parasites” and other “pathogens” is hit again, reinforcing the false notions of the disproven germ hypothesis and contagion.

Now the article expands the potential impact of “climate change” from more parasites to more pandemics—keep stirring up the fear that was such a strong motivator for compliance four years ago.

And if diseases become more rampant in the animal world, that could mean the likelihood of "spillover" events exposing humans to new pathogens — the likely origin of COVID-19, and a feared outcome of the ongoing spread of H5N1 bird flu — also will increase, the study suggests.

"It could mean that by modifying the environment, we increase the risks of future pandemics," Rohr said.

As grim as the findings appear, they underscore that actions to protect the planet can also serve to improve health, researchers said.

"This adds to a very long list of reasons we should be rapidly moving away from fossil fuels and trying to mitigate the impacts of climate change," said Felicia Keesing, a professor at Bard College who was not involved in the study but whose research focuses on biodiversity and disease risks.

Note again the language of fear—words like “rampant,” “risk,” “grim,” “new pathogens.” Also we see the statement that these “pathogens” are zoonotic in nature—they start out in other species and jump to humans. While the “virus” narrative has been around since the time of Louis Pasteur, the story that “viruses” jump between species started only a couple of decades ago, when bird flu and swine flu were first “found in humans.” This podcast with Steve Falconer, Dr. Mark Bailey, and Alec Zeck addresses the issue of “zoonotic origin” from 28:32 to 30:32. (The entire podcast is worth listening to, if you have 2 hours and 17 minutes sometime.)

Photo by Zachariah Smith on Unsplash

The “novel coronavirus” of 2019 supposedly originated from a bat. Just now, we are seeing fear-mongering about “avian flu viruses” showing up in wild bird populations which are passing it to domesticated birds which are then passing it to humans. This recycled “virus” scare also offers the control freaks an opportunity for another assault on raw milk, since the “virus” has supposedly been found there, passing from birds to cows and then into their milk, according to this fantasy.

‘Climate change’ propaganda

The article finishes with another effort to link “more pandemics” and “more parasites” to climate change. This linkage clearly shows how the official focus on “human-caused climate change” is related to the disproven germ hypothesis in shaping how we understand what is happening within and around us. Attributing “infections diseases” to “viruses” and bacteria gives cover to the health-damaging effects of industrial toxins, ubiquitous plastics, air and water pollution, and EMFs. In exactly the same way, making “climate change” the central environmental issue sweeps under the rug the actual, serious damage to the earth that is being caused by those same things: industrial chemicals and pesticides and chemical mining effluent being dumped into the water, aerial spraying dropping who knows what on the land, forever plastics now found in everything, and EMFs harming wildlife.

This “climate change” narrative has two purposes—one, to make us think that those in charge actually care about the Earth, and two, to induce guilt in us so we will agree to severe travel restrictions, loss of privacy, 15-minute cities, and all the rest of the features of the digital prison that they are calling the “Great Reset.”

There’s quite a bit more I could say about this article and the propaganda that is found in every word. I hope this partial deconstruction has demonstrated how issues beyond those related to health and sickness—e.g., “climate change,” “overpopulation,” and “humans are greedy and destructive by nature”—are woven together creating a fabric of control that is being tightened around us; but also how wobbly these narratives are if we see them as Jenga blocks precariously balanced on each other, with the “virus”/unproven germ hypothesis/contagion block starting to slide out of its position holding the whole thing up.

And I invite you, as always, to let your understanding of the nonexistence of “viruses” lead you to question many other narratives and assumptions about yourself and the world, so you can free your body and mind from the grid of control. Go down some rabbit holes, but carefully and slowly so you don’t destabilize yourself. Knowing the truth is essential, and not overwhelming your system is also essential.

Thanks for reading!

Recommended reading

Dawn Lester also deconstructed several media articles to reveal the fear-mongering propaganda and false assumptions woven throughout them.

Time for some common sense to prevail!

Brendan Murphy’s Truthiverse features a short essay by Daniel Roytas, author of Can You Catch a Cold? Another lie we’ve been told: disease need not be part of our experience.

Is Disease Just Part of Life?

Christine Massey’s Substack includes a link to Amandha Vollmer’s recent takedown of HPV (“human papilloma virus”) and some communication from Courtenay, a political prisoner on the Isle of Man for exposing the harms of the “Covid-19” jabs.

Isle of Man political prisoner & "HPV" - another virus that wasn't

Starfire Codes’ Meme Drop #96 is entertaining, as always, and also contains a message about the importance of unlearning so much of what we have been taught.

MEME DROP #96: A Big Part Of Becoming An Adult Is Unlearning A Lot Of The Shit You Were Taught