Here is a quote from Samuel Hahnemann, the great elder of Homeopathic Medicine, in his book, The Organon of Medicine, written in the 18th century
"The physician’s high and only mission is to restore the sick to health, that is, to cure.
1 His mission is not, however, to construct so-called systems, by interweaving empty speculations and hypotheses concerning the internal essential nature of the vital processes and the mode in which diseases originate in the interior of the organism, (whereon so many physicians have hitherto ambitiously wasted their talents and their time); nor is it to attempt to give countless explanations regarding the phenomena in diseases and their proximate cause (which must ever remain concealed), wrapped in unintelligible words and an inflated abstract mode of expression, which should sound very learned in order to astonish the ignorant – whilst sick humanity sighs in vain for aid. Of such learned reveries (to which the name of theoretic medicine is given, and for which special professorships are instituted) we have had quite enough, and it is now high time that all who call themselves physicians should at length cease to deceive suffering mankind with mere talk, and begin now, instead, for once to act, that is, really to help and to cure."
The belief that acute diseases are spread by contagion is part of a wider fallacy that weaselled its way into the European mindset long ago. In the age before a holocaust was unleashed upon forest wisdom, there were still wise healers who understood that we are part of nature, and our health or well-being depends upon maintaining that balance.
Thank you, Betsy, for sharing your research. The realisation that much of contemporary medicine is based on such shaky ground will open the way for a new paradigm, one that integrates ancestral wisdom with innovation.
"But if there’s not something contagious passing between people that explains how a whole family gets sick with the same symptoms at the same time, then what does cause this phenomenon? "
What's interesting is that the most common scenario is for some of the family (or workplace) to get sick while some remain perfectly well. If people getting sick together proves contagion, then those people who do not get sick (despite their proximity to sick people) must count as EQUAL evidence AGAINST the theory of contagion. What we should be left with is a stalemate at best.
We are all guilty of confirmation bias on this one. We never count those times when we do NOT 'catch' a cold from a sick friend or co worker as evidence against contagion theory. We even subconsciously explain it away by integrating terrain theory into germ theory..... "Oh well I must have been in a state of robust health at the time and therefore immune from coming down with it".
This concession to the terrain model is similar to how we have come to accept that there are 'good' bacteria and that actually we need those good bacteria to be healthy (and to stay alive).
These concessions to the terrain model mirror the 'health freedom movement' and their admission that 'covid' was really nothing and there was no pandemic ..... but in the next breath they claim there was still a new, 'deadly virus' (probably GoF) unleashed in 2020.
FWIW I've tried to express the farcical nature of this 'doublethink' in a film (link below). I believe everyone is speaking the truth (even Klaus Schwab) if we pay close enough attention to what they are saying. As the great Del Bigtree says when attempting to justify his doublethink show, "I have to speak the truth of the world that people believe in". That sentence perfectly explains how contagion theory has endured for so long :)
Also, he has gone into a deep dive of how/why 'Vitamin A' is a bunch of nonsense too. He has allegedly not had ANY 'Vitamin A' in something like 7 years, and he remedied many of his main ailments by doing so.
This leads me to believe all of the 'Vitamins' are a bunch of nonsense.
Pair this up with what Agent131711 has been researching regarding 'synthetic vitamins' and it paints a picture of the vitamin story being nothing but a scam. You can see Agent's research here:
Thanks for diving into this! Whenever I teach people about New Germanic Medicine and Universal Biology, this is one of the most asked questions. And there are actually thousands of examples where one person is ill and nobody else gets ill, but as humans we tend to focus on those examples that seem to align with the common (but disproven) narratives and beliefs. One thing I need to mention: the connection between scurvy and "Vitamin C" is false. It is also just another narrative to get people to buy and ingest copious amounts of a chemical substance referred to as "Vitamin C". Scurvy had a lot more to do with the hygienic conditions and the scarcity of healthy food and water onboard the ships that the sailors were on for weeks at a time. A lime is certainly a healthy food compared to other food that was not properly stored on those voyages, in addition to the mental state and the state of the "terrain" of the sailors. This is just in addition to my comment on your last article regarding the vitamin fraud :)
I am still struggling with the idea of Measle, and chicken pox parties. I am beginning to believe that our immune systems are so powerful that the more things we are exposed to the less chance of serious outcomes. Kind of 'what don't kill you makes you stronger'! I am certain that the micro environment of toxic chemicals in nearly every store bought concoction and faux food is causing great harm. Rockefellers AMA is a dangerous cartel concerned with profits not preventions.
Great to see more of this getting published. A new book written by Daniel Roytas (I have just started reading) asks Can you catch a cold? The answer so far from all available studies following the scientific method (the real one) is if course NO.
Terrain Therapy. The Final pandemic. What really makes you ill. All 4 all add nails in the germ hypothesis coffin, long overdue.
If there was contagion and viruses, then some wild virus would have killed off mankind over the last 5,000 years. The expert virologist clowns tell us that there are thousands or millions of viruses floating around. That many would attack the body and render it dead. There would be no escape.
There wasn't any vaccines until about 200 years ago, but they have never been proven to be of any use despite what the medical community wants us to believe. There is very, very little that is on the up and up about how the medical mafia conducts business. Consider that a truly healthy swath of humanity would put the medical mafia out of business except for emergency needs.
Thank you for writing this—so important for people to know the contagion problem. Regarding scurvy, some argue it to be the result of poisoning, not malnutrition. You may find Grant Genereux’s work on this of some interest—https://ggenereux.blog/2021/09/18/scurvy/amp/
Excellent article. Hopefully it lights a few fires for some newbies to the subject of the Contagion Myth.
We seem to grow up thinking that this temporary life includes a Big Easter Egg Hunt for Truths...but when it comes to health, my research is showing me that the truth about health, illness, and medicines is subjective & unique for each biological entity. There are hardly any, if any, one-size-fits-all assessments or solutions. It all depends on the individual's unique set of physiological, environmental, and psychological circumstances, situations, and conditions (past & present).
We were tricked by Pharma into thinking that health, illness & medicines is an objective subject and that Science had it all figured out -- that it only dealt with facts based on methodologies that were not flawed and were repeated & verified by independent researchers and labs.
Up until Science figured it all out, health, illness & medicines was a guessing game, more of an intuitive & experienced art or craft than a "science". It could be an educated guess based on experience, but each diagnosis & cause was still guessed at, and every treatment was a gamble. It has always been this way throughout human history >> guessing the cause and gambling on the treatment.
If you had a symptom and went to 100 allopathic (or any -pathic) doctors, how likely is it that you would get the same diagnosis and treatment from all 100 doctors? What if you went to 100 homeopaths, 100 naturopaths, 100 ancient Chinese Medicine doctors, 100 ancient Indian Medicine doctors, 100 African Voodoo Witchdoctors, isn't it likely you would end up with a variety of diagnoses & treatments?
After the penny drops about the heinous toxicity of many pharmaceuticals, you examine the deaths by so-called cancer, the deaths of beloved celebrities and family members, and you conclude that their deaths were wrong and if only they had known to avoid those poisons...blah blah blah...but clearly each life is a unique story. Each of us only has access to what mentally occurs to us in the here & now. Each of us is always doing his best to make the best choice -- and he cannot control what occurs to him mentally nor what treatment he submits to.
We don't know when or where or how we are going to die. Most deaths seem to be messy and/or painful and are not avoided by healthy diets & lifestyles. Most doctors and health-related "experts", if not murdered or otherwise killed instantly, DIE from illnesses & diseases despite their diets, lifestyles, and so-called expertise.
There is a very strong likelihood that this temporary life was a predetermined & scripted ride. Everyone died exactly the way they scripted it before this temporary world ever manifested. Each life was a unique story, and each biological body was as unique as the personality wearing it. Not everyone who smoked died from a smoking related illness; not everyone who drank died from drinking, and not everyone whose family allegedly had a "cancer gene" was ever diagnosed with cancer.
Some ill people take a substance that seems to help them, whilst others with the same symptoms take the same substance and it either does not help or it makes things worse -- hence, "One man's medicine is another man's poison".
No one really knows what the fuck is going on, but each of us have roles to play and lines to speak (or write), and the Show must go on and will go on. No one can control what they think or what they learn or how they behave. No one can control their circumstances, situation, or condition. And yet, we are compelled to treat each other as if he or she IS in control of what we think about and who we read and what we hanker for and what we gravitate towards and what we find attractive and what we find repulsive...
All that just to say, in answer to those who ask, What really makes us ill? -- We don't fucking know. Not really. It's always been a guess and a gamble. Saying that, it sure looks like it comes from within more than it comes from without ("The scary phone calls are coming from inside of your house!"). But people would rather blame their symptoms on "outside" causes (climate change, "chemtrails", 5G, "viruses") rather than their piss-poor diets and/or slovenly lifestyles.
My question to you, Betsy, is >> have you wondered about the subject of cancer, and wondered how many cancers are actually cancer? What about the tests? How were they chosen to be "truthful"? What if people, without symptoms, are taking fake tests for cancer like they take fake tests for HIV and then submit to treatments that kill them when all along they never really had cancer?
"Real" cancer is a product of the body -- and the body is wiser than the person inhabiting it -- so can it be true that "cancer" is a mistake? Is it not a living thing? Is it not a product of wisdom? And yet all we do is ATTACK the cancer and attempt to KILL IT and treat it like a mistake? Do we even look for a cause? Cancer is part of the body, attack the cancer and you attack the entire body. Attempt to kill the cancer and you attempt to kill the body. It doesn't seem to be right...
What if people are taking flawed/fake tests for cancer and being told erroneously that they have cancer and then submit to treatments that kill them but their death certificates list the cause of death as cancer? How many deaths caused by AZT were listed as being caused by HIV? Were ANY deaths caused by AZT ever listed as being caused by AZT on the death certificates?
Here is a quote from Samuel Hahnemann, the great elder of Homeopathic Medicine, in his book, The Organon of Medicine, written in the 18th century
"The physician’s high and only mission is to restore the sick to health, that is, to cure.
1 His mission is not, however, to construct so-called systems, by interweaving empty speculations and hypotheses concerning the internal essential nature of the vital processes and the mode in which diseases originate in the interior of the organism, (whereon so many physicians have hitherto ambitiously wasted their talents and their time); nor is it to attempt to give countless explanations regarding the phenomena in diseases and their proximate cause (which must ever remain concealed), wrapped in unintelligible words and an inflated abstract mode of expression, which should sound very learned in order to astonish the ignorant – whilst sick humanity sighs in vain for aid. Of such learned reveries (to which the name of theoretic medicine is given, and for which special professorships are instituted) we have had quite enough, and it is now high time that all who call themselves physicians should at length cease to deceive suffering mankind with mere talk, and begin now, instead, for once to act, that is, really to help and to cure."
The belief that acute diseases are spread by contagion is part of a wider fallacy that weaselled its way into the European mindset long ago. In the age before a holocaust was unleashed upon forest wisdom, there were still wise healers who understood that we are part of nature, and our health or well-being depends upon maintaining that balance.
Thank you, Betsy, for sharing your research. The realisation that much of contemporary medicine is based on such shaky ground will open the way for a new paradigm, one that integrates ancestral wisdom with innovation.
"But if there’s not something contagious passing between people that explains how a whole family gets sick with the same symptoms at the same time, then what does cause this phenomenon? "
What's interesting is that the most common scenario is for some of the family (or workplace) to get sick while some remain perfectly well. If people getting sick together proves contagion, then those people who do not get sick (despite their proximity to sick people) must count as EQUAL evidence AGAINST the theory of contagion. What we should be left with is a stalemate at best.
We are all guilty of confirmation bias on this one. We never count those times when we do NOT 'catch' a cold from a sick friend or co worker as evidence against contagion theory. We even subconsciously explain it away by integrating terrain theory into germ theory..... "Oh well I must have been in a state of robust health at the time and therefore immune from coming down with it".
This concession to the terrain model is similar to how we have come to accept that there are 'good' bacteria and that actually we need those good bacteria to be healthy (and to stay alive).
These concessions to the terrain model mirror the 'health freedom movement' and their admission that 'covid' was really nothing and there was no pandemic ..... but in the next breath they claim there was still a new, 'deadly virus' (probably GoF) unleashed in 2020.
FWIW I've tried to express the farcical nature of this 'doublethink' in a film (link below). I believe everyone is speaking the truth (even Klaus Schwab) if we pay close enough attention to what they are saying. As the great Del Bigtree says when attempting to justify his doublethink show, "I have to speak the truth of the world that people believe in". That sentence perfectly explains how contagion theory has endured for so long :)
https://odysee.com/@CoronaStudies:3/THE-GREAT-NARRATIVE:6
Great piece!
I would just suggest that we get our story right regarding the 'Vitamin C' story. I think it's probably nonsense, just like 'Vitamin A'.
Genereux did great work to debunk the myth that 'Vitamin C' 'cured' scurvy
You can find his excellent research on this topic here:
https://web.archive.org/web/20231127090110/https://ggenereux.blog/2021/09/18/scurvy/
Also, he has gone into a deep dive of how/why 'Vitamin A' is a bunch of nonsense too. He has allegedly not had ANY 'Vitamin A' in something like 7 years, and he remedied many of his main ailments by doing so.
This leads me to believe all of the 'Vitamins' are a bunch of nonsense.
Pair this up with what Agent131711 has been researching regarding 'synthetic vitamins' and it paints a picture of the vitamin story being nothing but a scam. You can see Agent's research here:
https://chemtrails.substack.com/p/dr-lee-merritt-is-lying-about-me?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=1865725&post_id=143636454&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=xafil&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email
Thanks for diving into this! Whenever I teach people about New Germanic Medicine and Universal Biology, this is one of the most asked questions. And there are actually thousands of examples where one person is ill and nobody else gets ill, but as humans we tend to focus on those examples that seem to align with the common (but disproven) narratives and beliefs. One thing I need to mention: the connection between scurvy and "Vitamin C" is false. It is also just another narrative to get people to buy and ingest copious amounts of a chemical substance referred to as "Vitamin C". Scurvy had a lot more to do with the hygienic conditions and the scarcity of healthy food and water onboard the ships that the sailors were on for weeks at a time. A lime is certainly a healthy food compared to other food that was not properly stored on those voyages, in addition to the mental state and the state of the "terrain" of the sailors. This is just in addition to my comment on your last article regarding the vitamin fraud :)
Have you looked into what our Creator says about viruses and contagion? I have looked into scriptures if you want to read. https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vT14y9fEKOEZzlVls7uNbA0g1lRfOtMtqbxhpEe7kjVE8fMkMeACP1nugoV-c_ZkI5LVJlJyxGbthWC/pub
I am still struggling with the idea of Measle, and chicken pox parties. I am beginning to believe that our immune systems are so powerful that the more things we are exposed to the less chance of serious outcomes. Kind of 'what don't kill you makes you stronger'! I am certain that the micro environment of toxic chemicals in nearly every store bought concoction and faux food is causing great harm. Rockefellers AMA is a dangerous cartel concerned with profits not preventions.
great article, Betsy!
Great to see more of this getting published. A new book written by Daniel Roytas (I have just started reading) asks Can you catch a cold? The answer so far from all available studies following the scientific method (the real one) is if course NO.
Terrain Therapy. The Final pandemic. What really makes you ill. All 4 all add nails in the germ hypothesis coffin, long overdue.
Love ❤️ 💕 💗 your articles, Betsy.
Bless you for doing this work!
If there was contagion and viruses, then some wild virus would have killed off mankind over the last 5,000 years. The expert virologist clowns tell us that there are thousands or millions of viruses floating around. That many would attack the body and render it dead. There would be no escape.
There wasn't any vaccines until about 200 years ago, but they have never been proven to be of any use despite what the medical community wants us to believe. There is very, very little that is on the up and up about how the medical mafia conducts business. Consider that a truly healthy swath of humanity would put the medical mafia out of business except for emergency needs.
Thank you for writing this—so important for people to know the contagion problem. Regarding scurvy, some argue it to be the result of poisoning, not malnutrition. You may find Grant Genereux’s work on this of some interest—https://ggenereux.blog/2021/09/18/scurvy/amp/
Excellent article. Hopefully it lights a few fires for some newbies to the subject of the Contagion Myth.
We seem to grow up thinking that this temporary life includes a Big Easter Egg Hunt for Truths...but when it comes to health, my research is showing me that the truth about health, illness, and medicines is subjective & unique for each biological entity. There are hardly any, if any, one-size-fits-all assessments or solutions. It all depends on the individual's unique set of physiological, environmental, and psychological circumstances, situations, and conditions (past & present).
We were tricked by Pharma into thinking that health, illness & medicines is an objective subject and that Science had it all figured out -- that it only dealt with facts based on methodologies that were not flawed and were repeated & verified by independent researchers and labs.
Up until Science figured it all out, health, illness & medicines was a guessing game, more of an intuitive & experienced art or craft than a "science". It could be an educated guess based on experience, but each diagnosis & cause was still guessed at, and every treatment was a gamble. It has always been this way throughout human history >> guessing the cause and gambling on the treatment.
If you had a symptom and went to 100 allopathic (or any -pathic) doctors, how likely is it that you would get the same diagnosis and treatment from all 100 doctors? What if you went to 100 homeopaths, 100 naturopaths, 100 ancient Chinese Medicine doctors, 100 ancient Indian Medicine doctors, 100 African Voodoo Witchdoctors, isn't it likely you would end up with a variety of diagnoses & treatments?
After the penny drops about the heinous toxicity of many pharmaceuticals, you examine the deaths by so-called cancer, the deaths of beloved celebrities and family members, and you conclude that their deaths were wrong and if only they had known to avoid those poisons...blah blah blah...but clearly each life is a unique story. Each of us only has access to what mentally occurs to us in the here & now. Each of us is always doing his best to make the best choice -- and he cannot control what occurs to him mentally nor what treatment he submits to.
We don't know when or where or how we are going to die. Most deaths seem to be messy and/or painful and are not avoided by healthy diets & lifestyles. Most doctors and health-related "experts", if not murdered or otherwise killed instantly, DIE from illnesses & diseases despite their diets, lifestyles, and so-called expertise.
There is a very strong likelihood that this temporary life was a predetermined & scripted ride. Everyone died exactly the way they scripted it before this temporary world ever manifested. Each life was a unique story, and each biological body was as unique as the personality wearing it. Not everyone who smoked died from a smoking related illness; not everyone who drank died from drinking, and not everyone whose family allegedly had a "cancer gene" was ever diagnosed with cancer.
Some ill people take a substance that seems to help them, whilst others with the same symptoms take the same substance and it either does not help or it makes things worse -- hence, "One man's medicine is another man's poison".
No one really knows what the fuck is going on, but each of us have roles to play and lines to speak (or write), and the Show must go on and will go on. No one can control what they think or what they learn or how they behave. No one can control their circumstances, situation, or condition. And yet, we are compelled to treat each other as if he or she IS in control of what we think about and who we read and what we hanker for and what we gravitate towards and what we find attractive and what we find repulsive...
All that just to say, in answer to those who ask, What really makes us ill? -- We don't fucking know. Not really. It's always been a guess and a gamble. Saying that, it sure looks like it comes from within more than it comes from without ("The scary phone calls are coming from inside of your house!"). But people would rather blame their symptoms on "outside" causes (climate change, "chemtrails", 5G, "viruses") rather than their piss-poor diets and/or slovenly lifestyles.
My question to you, Betsy, is >> have you wondered about the subject of cancer, and wondered how many cancers are actually cancer? What about the tests? How were they chosen to be "truthful"? What if people, without symptoms, are taking fake tests for cancer like they take fake tests for HIV and then submit to treatments that kill them when all along they never really had cancer?
"Real" cancer is a product of the body -- and the body is wiser than the person inhabiting it -- so can it be true that "cancer" is a mistake? Is it not a living thing? Is it not a product of wisdom? And yet all we do is ATTACK the cancer and attempt to KILL IT and treat it like a mistake? Do we even look for a cause? Cancer is part of the body, attack the cancer and you attack the entire body. Attempt to kill the cancer and you attempt to kill the body. It doesn't seem to be right...
What if people are taking flawed/fake tests for cancer and being told erroneously that they have cancer and then submit to treatments that kill them but their death certificates list the cause of death as cancer? How many deaths caused by AZT were listed as being caused by HIV? Were ANY deaths caused by AZT ever listed as being caused by AZT on the death certificates?