How can they not be connecting the dots?
Why believing in contagious germs and pathogenic viruses makes it impossible for some to see the 'Covid vaccine' as having anything to do with 'unexplained deaths'
Greetings, dear readers, and welcome to installment four of This Changes Everything, a newsletter devoted to exploring the reasons why it is of utmost importance that we understand that “viruses” are fictional. My top five reasons were outlined in my first article, It matters that viruses don’t exist. Subsequent articles, Stop the next plandemic before it starts and ‘Germ theory’ hooks us to drugs and needles dealt with the first two reasons.
Today, Reason #3: The false narrative of “germ theory” blocks people from seeing other potential causes of illness, especially preventing them from even wondering if a “vaccine” could be the cause. This is very effective at keeping more people from waking up to the vast devastation of the “Covid” jabs and, with deep and sad irony, drives those thus deluded toward greater dependence on these medical interventions in misguided hopes that one more booster will keep them from being added to the number experiencing unexplained illness and death.
“Germ theory” has been the primary explanation for disease since at least the late 19th century, when Louis Pasteur appeared to “win” the disagreement among scientists of his time as to whether or not invisible pathogenic microbes caused illness. Pasteur, also known among his admirers as “the father of germ theory” and “the inventor of microbiology,” has been viewed as a hero for more than a century for his germ theory “research” on bacteria and development of vaccines.
Wait—organic milk should be the most healthful, right? But it’s not just pasteurized—it’s ultra-pasteurized.
Pasteur’s name has been immortalized in the process by which the beneficial bacteria and enzymes in raw milk are destroyed, rendering it “harmless.” I grew up drinking pasteurized milk, and my kids drank it when they were growing up. Raw milk—straight from the cow, nothing added or taken away—is actually illegal in many places, and very difficult to get in most others, because of the still-pervasive belief that unpasteurized milk can make you sick. (For the truth about raw milk, see Is Raw Milk Safe on the Weston A. Price Foundation Wise Traditions podcast).
But researchers like Mike Stone, CopperVortex, and others reviewing the history of Pasteur are finding that he was no hero. He cheated in his lab work and faked demonstrations that his vaccine would protect sheep from anthrax, a disease supposedly caused by a bacteria. Many farmers gave Pasteur’s vaccine to their sheep, and many sheep died. Yet his penchant for self-promotion and friends in high places succeeded in establishing him as a brilliant scientist whose contribution has saved many lives, a false image that persists to this day.
In the same way, “germ theory” and its stepchild, virology, have been firmly embedded in the public’s ideas about health and medicine for the past century, even though there was and still is no scientific evidence for them. We could speculate on why that is, but we wouldn’t have to look far to connect the now-massive pharmaceutical industry to the perpetuation of these incorrect beliefs. As long as people believe that germs cause illness, they will use antibiotics. As long as they believe viruses could kill them or create pandemics, they will take vaccines. These two forms of big pharma medication are in widespread use, guaranteeing ongoing massive income for those companies.
Bacteria and “viruses” are generally said to cause “illnesses” that have specific sets of symptoms, like coughs and congestion, skin rashes, digestive upset, achiness, and other such externally evident symptoms. These experiences, which are most likely body detox events, are usually temporary conditions that resolve within a week or two, with or without medication. “Diseases” that are more chronic in nature, such as cancer, heart disease, diabetes, MS, Crohn’s, arthritis, Parkinson’s, and many others, typically are not thought to be caused by bacteria or “viruses,” though research is constantly going on to “discover the virus” that causes each of these. This is in order to develop “vaccines” for them.
But usually, these kinds of more chronic and systemic “illnesses” are attributed to a weak or “bad” gene that predisposes the person to that condition. Such susceptibilities are thought to “run in families.” Huge amounts of research are done to “find” these flawed genes and label them, in hopes of developing (hugely expensive) genetic treatments or advising people with such genes to take (also expensive) prophylactic surgical measures such as a double mastectomy for women with the “breast cancer gene.” In the absence of clear knowledge of such a genetic weakness, though, the doctor will say she just doesn’t know why you got that “disease.” The cause is “unknown” or “unexplained.”
So the causes of “disease,” informally stated, according to western medical science, are “bad germs,” “bad genes,” or “bad luck.” You got exposed to a “germ” from your kindergartner, your fellow worshipper down the pew, the stranger who sat next to you on the bus, or your co-worker who came to work with a cough because they couldn’t afford to miss a day of work. Or you were born with flawed genetics that make you vulnerable to who knows what kinds of malfunction of your body—a “weak heart,” a tendency to create tumors, nerves that misfire, brain cells that layer themselves with plaque so you lose your memory, a gut that is hypersensitive to certain foods. Etc.
And if a germ or a gene failure can’t be cited, you are just unlucky in the roulette of disease, and become a random victim of unknown forces (very scientific, no?). In this scenario also, your body is inept, prone to breakdowns, incapable of maintaining a high level of health, easily overcome by these unknown forces, and even may inexplicably turn on itself and start destroying its own tissue (“autoimmune disease”). Corollary to this is that whatever “disease” you suffer may be your fault, because you ate the wrong foods, didn’t exercise enough, or didn’t get your mammograms or colonoscopies regularly.
“Bad genes” are actually a subset of “bad luck,” since genes are viewed as unchangeable, and what you got at birth is what you have for life. The “it’s your fault” subset of “bad luck” is a double-edged one, since what we eat and how we move as well as other choices we make are important factors in health that we do have control over. But since doctors rarely acknowledge the importance of real food (including raw milk!), and often give exercise little more than an obligatory mention, it is rather disingenuous for this discourse about why we get sick to include blaming you. But it does. Maybe it’s because doctors get tired of saying “I don’t know why you’re sick,” so they make it your fault.
So, to summarize, the 3Bs narrative, “bad germs,” “bad genes,” and “bad luck,” strongly supports the medical-industrial complex, with all its “medicines” and treatments that make health care one of the largest sectors in the US economy. As I elaborated in my previous post, ‘Germ theory’ hooks us to drugs and needles, the 3Bs narrative also lets environmental toxins, both physical and non-physical, completely off the hook for having any role in ill health, along with emotional, spiritual, and mental toxins, injuries, and malnutrition. And, most relevant to this moment, it categorically disallows the possibility that vaccines could cause ill health or death.
If you accept this, and you never entertain the notion that such things as pesticides, EMFs, stress, fear of getting sick, emotional traumas, inadequate touch or contact, etc., could cause disease, you will see the vast increase in “unexplained” illness and death since the “Covid” jabs came into use through this lens. The view you get will exclude even the possibility of injury by a “vaccine.”
You will watch young athletes in top physical condition drop over dead on the playing field and not even wonder if they had the jab. You will hear of the 14-year-old daughter of a friend “dying suddenly” and feel such sadness, and you may shake your fist at the sky and cry, “Why her? Why someone so young and fresh?” But you won’t seriously ask yourself why—what was the immediate cause of this fresh young person suddenly dying? You may go to five funerals in two months for people in your wider friend circle, and think, “I’ve never seen so many deaths so close together among people I know.” But you will normalize it as “bad luck” and coincidence. You will shrug and think, “That’s just the way it is.”
Did you ever wonder why there should be one category of diseases that have very precise causes, i.e., each different “disease” its own specific microbe, and next to that a whole array of other diseases for which there is “no known cause?” Doesn’t that seem a little strange?
As I see it, “germ theory” is not only the narrative that greatly misleads us as to what “disease” really is and what real health is; but it has also been weaponized to stop people from even thinking about “vaccines” as a possible cause of illness and death. This has a very deliberate benefit to the maniacs that want to control the whole world, for obvious reasons.
Of course, they have also created a term, “anti-vax,” and a narrative to go with it, that goes back long before March 2020. In those days, when I would even just suggest that maybe vaccines should be looked at for potential harmful effects, I was viciously attacked by “friends.” Jill Stein, Green Party candidate for president in 2016 who is also a medical doctor, was loudly slammed as “anti-vax” for making a similar statement. This denouncing of anyone asking the slightest question about the safety and efficacy of vaccines has been extremely virulent in the past four years, with suggestions that people who declined the jab should be imprisoned, forcibly injected, or even killed. Many unjabbed people were denied health care, and deaths resulted. Meanwhile millions have been and are being maimed and killed by the “Covid vaccine.”
The dots of “Covid” “vaccine” injury and death are everywhere, and proliferating daily. But those dots can’t be connected if they can’t be seen. This is just one more reason why it’s important that “germ theory,” virology, and contagion be exposed as false paradigms.
Thanks for staying with me! Next week, Reason #4 why no-virus is important: The whole narrative mis-educates us about how our bodies operate to maintain balance and get rid of substances and influences that impair the terrain. What we are wrongly told about the weakness of our bodies and their need for constant medical intervention of one sort or another keeps us from seeing our bodies’ inherent wisdom and power to stay healthy, and our agency in that process.
Thanks for recommending me, Betsy!
Yes, pasteurization/denaturing enzymes and probiotics means you lose the nourishment that you would have gained from that living chi energy. Buy raw honey, eat more raw salads, where the nourishment is not nuked. And it is no wonder that the top 5-6 'foods' are all dead, not alive, but also all GMO: corn, soybean, sugar, canola, and wheat (uses glyphosate to dessicate the crop, since it's so good at killing cells). They are all long-lasting, storable commodities used in processed foods and livestock/dairy. Cottonseed oil is probably the worst seed oil, and of course cotton (GMO!) is one of the heaviest pesticided crop. And on top of that, they tell you your lawn needs to be spotless, which requires glyphosate Roundup! Eat your 'weeds'!
And yes, they tell us that the hepatitis 'viruses' only affect the liver and not any other organs, and likewise for other specific organs or systems, and yet some 'viruses' they say are passed from ticks, mosquitoes, bacteria, etc. to other species. I always suspect that one reason for blaming things on ticks and mosquitoes is so that people abhor nature, which then further decreases people's health, and they've done a great job of convincing most to avoid nature.
And as I stated in the Part 1 Pasteur article, the use of arsenic in products like Cooper's Sheep Dip was common back then, which is the real reason, not 'anthrax'. Here's a quote from Dawn Lester and David Parker's What Really Makes You Ill (Pasteur got the ball rolling with his anthrax and rabies vaccines but those vaccines are rare these days, one because they stopped using arsenic in cattle, at least in developed countries):
"In Pasteur: Plagiarist, Imposter, R B Pearson relates a number of incidents that demonstrate the failure of the Pasteur anthrax vaccine to protect animals from the disease. In a particularly clear example, he describes the use of the Pasteur vaccine in Russia, where 4,564 sheep were vaccinated, after which 3,696 sheep died; a phenomenally high failure rate."
And what a shame that the (so-called) “Medical Freedom Movement” either wants to keep the virus hypothesis alive or says that the no-virus argument is socially unacceptable! With friends like those, who needs (BigPharma) enemies!